War Crimes Tribunal Indictments of Accused in 9-11

Share Share Share 140px textVancouver 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal expected to issue Indictments of Accused in 9/11 events on January 22, 2013



9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Judges Alfred Lambremont Webre & Constance Fogal,
June 17, 2012

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal expected to issue Indictments of Accused in 9/11
events on January 22, 2013

VANCOUVER, B.C. – At a meeting of the Judges of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
held Friday September, 28, 2012 in Vancouver, BC, Judge Constance Fogal,
B.A., M.A, B.ED, LL.B and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd reaffirmed the
plan of the 9/11 Tribunal to issue Indictments of key Accused in the events
of September 11, 2001 on January 22, 2013.

Judges Fogal and Webre met two days after formally separating from
conference organizers and specific speakers at June 15-17, 2012 Vancouver,
BC conference http://www.911vancouverhearings.com/ on a disagreement over
the 9/11 Tribunal’s judicial independence and an attempt at suppression of
9/11 evidence. The Tribunal’s separation was made formal in a Notice of
Decision dated September 26, 2012
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/911_war_crimes_tribunal/2012/09/notice-of-decision-in-order-to-provide-for-the-judicial-independence-of-the-911-war-crimes-tribunal.html , set out on the Tribunal’s website


9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is a Tribunal of Conscience whose mission is
the investigation, prosecution, trial, conviction and sentencing of key
individuals participating in a common plan and conspiracy to execute a false
flag operation on September 11, 2001, disguised as a “terrorist attack” on
the U.S. mainland, with the real objectives of launching a war of aggression
and domestic police state worldwide. Judge Webre is also a Judge on the
Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal

that on Nov. 22, 2011 found George W. Bush and Tony Blair guilty of crimes against
peace for launching the illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq using false and
deceptive “Weapons of Mass Destruction” grounds.

Affidavits of 9/11 Tribunal witnesses Leuren Moret & Andrew D. Basiago

The organizers of the June 15-17, 2012 conference and 17 of its 19 speakers
essentially staged a walk-out from the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal because
Judges Fogal and Webre exercised judicial independence and introduced the
affidavits of 9/11 witnesses Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD & Andrew D. Basiago,
JD, MPhil (Cantab) into Tribunal evidence.

The four 9/11 witnesses with the 9/11 Tribunal presently include: Andrew D.
Basiago, JD, MPhil (Cantab), Dean T. Hartwell, JD, Susan Lindauer, MA, and
Leuren Moret, MA, PhD ABD.

Mr. Basiago, an attorney in Washington State, is a former U.S. chrononaut
with DARPA’s Project Pegasus 1968-72 and the CIA’s Jump Room program
1980-83. Dean T. Hartwell has written three books about 9/11 including,
Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11; Facts Talk but the
Guilty Walk: the 9/11 No Hijacker Theory and its Indictment of our Leaders.
Susan Lindauer is the author of Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of
the Patriot Act and the Cover-Ups of 9/11 and Iraq. Ms. Lindauer, who has a
Masters degree in public policy from the London School of Economics, has
been a reporter with U.S. News & World Report, and has worked for
Representative Peter DeFazio, D-Oregon; Representative Ron Wyden, D-Oregon
and Senator Carol Moseley Braun, D-Illinois to whom she was press secretary
and speech writer. Leuren Moret was an Expert Witness at the International
Criminal Tribunal For Afghanistan At Tokyo, and a speaker at the 2007 Kuala
Lumpur War Crimes Conference. She is on the organizing committee of the
World Committee on Radiation Risk; has been an environmental commissioner
for the City of Berkeley; a speaker at the 2007 Vancouver 9/11 conference
and has conducted numerous interviews on 9/11.

A momentary sadness

In a September 28, 2012 letter to the remaining 9/11 Tribunal witnesses, the
Tribunal Judges wrote: “My fellow Judge Constance Fogal and I had a meeting
today at my home to review the status of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal. One
the one hand, we felt a momentary sadness that the folks at 9/11 Vancouver
Hearings had decided to go down the path of fear, control, suspicion, and
self-destruction it seems in the face of the Tribunal’s assertion of its
clear rights and responsibilities under the law of Tribunal of Conscience.
As I wrote to their group email on September 27, 2012, the 9/11 War Crimes
Tribunal is closing the books on the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings, and moving on
with the business of our Tribunal.

“On the other hand, Judge Fogal and I felt reassured and encouraged that
9/11 witnesses of your ethics and caliber are moving forward with the
Tribunal to secure investigation, prosecution, trial, conviction and
sentencing of the principal 9/11 Accused.”

The Moret Affidavit: The U.K., French, and Canadian 9/11 connections

The Judge’s letter continues, “Leuren Moret’s submission and affidavit is
vital because it identifies key 9/11 Accused who are U.K., French and
Canadian nationals and who appear to be members of an executive within an
international war crimes racketeering organization that gave orders for
9/11, the ‘top’ of a pyramidal network, as it were. As U.K., French and
Canadian nationals, these 9/11 Accused in turn provide the Article 12
jurisdiction for 9/11 before the International Criminal Court. Ms. Moret’s
affidavit is able to build on the singularly important affidavit of our
distinguished attorney whistleblower witness, former DARPA participant
Andrew D. Basiago.”

Article 12 of the Rome Statue of the International Criminal Court (ICC)
provides that one of the grounds for ICC jurisdiction is that the person
accused of war crimes be a national of a state that is a party to the Rome
Statute establishing the ICC. The speakers who walked out of the 9/11 War
Crimes Tribunal had mainly named 9/11 Accused who were USA or Israeli
citizens, neither of whom are subject to ICC jurisdiction.

Judge Webre is in active coordination of prosecution of 9/11 Accused with
Judge Fernando Imposimato, honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy
and former Chief Investigative Judge of Italy. Judge Imposimato
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/332580 recently announced he was
launching a drive to prosecute key 9/11 Accused at the ICC.

The Basiago Affidavit: Circumventing an attempted suppression of 9/11

On February 23, 2012, Judge Webre approached the organizers of the planned
June 15-17, 2012 conference with a proposal that former U.S. chrononaut
Andrew D. Basiago be a speaker at the upcoming conference. Judge Webre
stated, “In a word, we have a whistleblower from DARPA quantum access
projects who is an eyewitness to DARPA/CIA possession of images of the
controlled demolition of the twin towers on September 11, 2011 in 1971. We
have an eyewitness to Donald H. Rumsfeld’s personal knowledge of these
images in 1971, as defence liaison for this DARPA project to the 1971 Nixon
Cabinet, of which he was a member. Need I remind you that Donald H. Rumsfeld
is, by prima facie evidence, a prime suspect in the 9/11 false flag
operation? (Please see [my] articles below).

“That eyewitness [Andrew D. Basiago] is a member of the bar of the state of
Washington and a 10-year colleague of mine and of impeccable credentials,
Andrew D. Basiago. We both spoke at the 2009 Conspiracy Con, and have
spoken at numerous US and international conferences and media on these

“As long as you continue to gate-keep this evidence and information about
9/11 by keeping at least a presentation of this evidence from a public forum
like The Vancouver Hearings, you are doing the public a great disservice,

Although Mr. Basiago was not invited to be a speaker at the June 15-17, 2012
conference, Judge Webre was invited to be a Judge on the 9/11 Tribunal and
in his position as War Crimes Judge was asked to invite other distinguished
jurists and public figures to join him on the 9/11 Tribunal.

June 22, 2012 Invitation for submissions

One of Judge Webre’s first acts on the 9/11 Tribunal following the June
15-17, 2012 conference was to send a June 22, 2012 invitation to all
speakers and to additional 9/11 witnesses (as was the Tribunal’s right) to
submit written Evidentiary Submissions and sworn Affidavits that would form
the basis of the Tribunal’s Indictment of 9/11 Accused. The conference
organizers, all 19 speakers, in addition to Leuren Moret and Andrew D.
Basiago, received this invitation along with a Witness Docket listing
everyone’s names, email addresses and the September 22, 2012 date the
invitation was sent. In addition, Judge Webre notified the organizers at
and after the conference that he would be so doing.

In early September 2012, when the 9/11 Vancouver Hearings organizers
notified Judge Webre they intended to review the affidavit of Andrew D.
Basiago before it could be admitted into evidence before the Tribunal, Judge
Webre understood immediately that this was an effort by the conference
organizers to usurp 9/11 Tribunal independence, and gate-keep vital forensic
evidence about 9/11 from the Tribunal.

Therefore, as was is the prerogative of the 9/11 Tribunal, Judge Webre filed
the Affidavit of Andrew D. Basiago into the Witness Docket and sent a
courtesy copy to the conference organizer, thereby entering the Basiago
Affidavit into evidence and circumventing an attempted suppression of 9/11
evidence by the conference organizers.

Legal implications of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Following the issuance of an 9/11 Tribunal Indictment against specific named
individuals who allegedly participated in a common plan and conspiracy in
the events of 9/11, there are multiple legal venues in which the criminal
charges in the Indictment can be prosecuted and tried, and verdicts and
judgments reached and enforced against the 9/11 Accused.

A. International law – The alleged crimes of the Accused in the Information
and Indictment may be found to violate the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and
constitute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity.

At the June 15-17, 2012 9/11 Vancouver Hearings Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre stated,
“The 9/11 false flag operations may qualify as a crime against peace, war
crime, genocide, and crime against humanity, inter alia, if it can be
demonstrated that the true intent of the 9/11 perpetrators was to carry out
9/11 as a pretext for invading Afghanistan, which invasion and war has been
found to be genocidal because of the use of depleted uranium weapons and
other reasons.

So the legal chain of culpability is there, under the
Nuremberg precedents of a crime against peace and starting an unjust war.
The Tokyo Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan, in an opinion by Judge
Niloufer Bhagwat, found that U.S. President George W. Bush and his
administration had committed war crimes, genocide, and crimes against
humanity through the horrific birth defects and other widespread genetic and
health damage cause to Afghan civilians through the U.S. use of depleted
uranium weapons.”

The 9/11 War Crimes Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 Tribunal to the
national courts of any of the more than 100 nations, such as Germany and
Spain, that are signatories to the Rome statue of the International Criminal
Court (ICC) for prosecution and enforcement, as well as to the ICC itself.
The chief prosecutor of the ICC, to the criticism of many throughout the
world, has failed to act on over 400 complaints on war crimes in Iraq and in
Afghanistan by US and UK forces, and has privately stated he will not take
jurisdiction of 9/11.

Organization of American States – According to one source, “The Vancouver
9/11 Indictment can also be submitted to the Organization of American States
(OAS) which might be an even better choice since it has the only
international criminal court the U.S. has signed onto and the other OAS
member countries may not be so biased in favor the U.S. One attorney took
the U.S. government as a defendant there to get an opinion on the fact that
the US used Depleted Uranium weapons on hospitals in Granada during the U.S.
attack on Granada. She won and the U.S. had to rebuild all the hospitals
they destroyed in Granada. She never would have achieved that victory in
any other international courts.”

B. U.S. Congress – The 9/11 War Crimes Indictment can be taken by the 9/11
War Crimes Tribunal to the U.S. Senate and to the U.S. House of
Representatives Judiciary Committee for the appointment of a Special
Prosecutor to prosecute the Accused Treason under Article III of the U.S.
Constitution, which provides, “Treason against the United States, shall
consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies,
giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless
on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in
open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of
Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or
Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

There is legal precedent for such an action. In November 2007, a Memorandum
was presented to senior Congressional staff and personally to Rep John
Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee setting out sufficient
prima facie evidence of Article III (3) treason in connection with the
events of 9/11 by George W. Bush, Richard B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, and
other Jane and John Does. Senior Congressional staff acknowledged the
seriousness of the allegations in the Memorandum. Rep. Conyers took the
Memorandum home to Detroit, MI over the Thanksgiving 2007 holidays promising
an answer as to whether he would move on the file after the Holidays. To
this date, no answer has been forthcoming from Rep. Conyers.

C. Canadian Parliament – There are various concurrent efforts to have the
Parliament of Canada investigate the 9/11 events, as NORAD is a joint
Canada/USA function and 26 Canadians were killed at the World Trade Center
on 9/11.

The 9/11 Vancouver Indictment can be taken by the 9/11 Vancouver
Tribunal to members of Parliament and the Senate, including the Prime
Minister and the Opposition Leaders in the Parliament of Canada to appoint a
Public Inquiry to investigate and report on possible criminal violations by
Canadian persons or U.S. persons, including U.S. government employees or
contractors/agents, and other individuals flowing out of the 9/11 events.

D. Prosecution for murder – The 9/11 War Crimes Indictment can be taken by
the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal to any District attorney and/or U.S. Attorneys
in the United States of America, and to any Public Prosecutors in other
nations whose citizens were killed in the World Trade Center or the events
of 9/11. The alleged Accused, Co-conspirators and persons acting in a common
plan to cause, facilitate or support the events of September 11, 2001 can
each be prosecuted for murder by a U.S. attorney, by a district attorney or
by public prosecutors of a nation whose citizens were killed at the World
Trade Center or in any aspect of the false flag operation on September 11,

E. 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal – The 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal can establish a
formal Tribunal for a trial of the Accused under the 9/11 War Crimes
Indictment. This trial would be heard by the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
Judges, with appointed prosecutors, counsel for the Accused and due process
for the Accused. A sister tribunal of conscience, the Kuala Lumpur War
Crimes Tribunal, has successfully tried George W. Bush, Tony Blair, Richard
B. Cheney, Donald H. Rumsfeld, et al. for war crimes in Iraq.

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Judges on the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal include Constance (Connie) Fogal,
B.A, B.Ed, M.A., LL.B, and Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd. Connie Fogal
is former leader of the Canadian Action Party, former Vancouver Parks Board
Commissioner, former Director, Kitsilano and Vancouver Community Resource
boards; lawyer with the Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee to oppose what
Fogal sees as threats to Canadian constitutional sovereignty. Alfred
Lambremont Webre is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal,
submitted a Memorandum to the Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives
Judiciary Committee calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor to
investigate 9/11 and was a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty.


9/11 War Crimes Tribunal



*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only ***
CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. Posts archived at http://tinyurl.com/cv8kgph.

NOTE: Some links may
require cut and paste into your Internet Browser. Please check for daily
real news posts and support the truth! free book download:

Senders do not necessarily agree with

*** Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research
Purposes only. ***

NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the
National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning,
warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative
oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection………. IF anyone other
than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the
1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5
& H.R. 1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts
represent parody & satire & are all intended for intellectual entertainment
only. To be removed from the truth news list, please reply with the subject
line “REMOVE”

One thought on “War Crimes Tribunal Indictments of Accused in 9-11”

  1. Could anyone help me contact Judge Fernando Imposimato, the Italian Judge mentioned here? I am an Italian/English translator, typist, proofreader, editor and would love to work with his team! Thank you for any kind help.

    Best regards,



Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s