UAL Flight 93 Landed Safely At Cleveland Hopkins Airport

Plane Lands In Cleveland – Bomb Feared Aboard
8-7-4

Reported by 9News Staff
Web produced by:Liz Foreman
9/11/01 11:43:57 AM

A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.

White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated.

United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did not say how many people were aboard the flight.

United said it was also “deeply concerned” about another flight, Flight 175, a Boeing 767, which was bound from Boston to Los Angeles.

On behalf of the airline CEO James Goodwin said: “The thoughts of everyone at United are with the passengers and crew of these flights. Our prayers are also with everyone on the ground who may have been involved.

“United is working with all the relevant authorities, including the FBI, to obtain further information on these flights,” he said.

______

Reply to email commenting on Flight 93 using link

http://www.wcpo.com/specials/2001/americaattacked/news_local/story14.html

Visit To Ohio: “Flight 93 has landed safely”

A reminder of the WCPO TV Channel 9 report that quoted Mayor Michael White, and the CEO of United, who both said with certainty that flight 93

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gY-4dXhxuvc

Article about Flight 93 on the day of 911 WCPO.com(Read Full Screen)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCIl9v9LuIs

No Body Parts Found At Flt 93 Crash Scene

http://www.flight93crash.com/flight93_secondary_debris_field.html#2nd

http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=193

better: http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/print.php?storyid=193

Dulce Decorum

Dulce still points out, that something is odd with the serial numbers of Flight93 and Flight 175.
The serial numbers of the ORIGINAL planes are SAME serial numbers of the planes that ARE STILL FLYING. 591UA and 612UA.

Dulce argues, that though N-number can be transferred, the manufacturer serial number CANNOT be transferred.

According to some spot-witnesses, Boeing 757-222 SERIAL NUMBER 28142 is flying around Chicago under the alias 594UA.

According to the FAA, N594UA Boeing 757-222 flies now with a DIFFERENT serial number, namely 28145.

Something is fishy.

9/11 Flight 93 – Cleveland Mayor Hijacked Boeing 767 In A Secure Area Of The Airport

On the morning of 9/11 a little known Cincinnati television station ran a story saying Flight 93 landed at Cleveland International Airport instead …

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDofaePZTTU

Proof that 9/11 flight 93 did not crash at Shanksville

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUzrHHDu96U

Flt 93 LANDED In Cleveland Morning Of 911

Plane Lands In Cleveland –
Bomb Feared Aboard
5-5-6

Reported by: 9News Staff
Web produced by: Liz Foreman
9/11/01 11:43:57 AM
A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.
White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated.
United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did say how many people were aboard the flight.
United said it was also “deeply concerned” about another flight, Flight 175, a Boeing 767, which was bound from Boston to Los Angeles.
On behalf of the airline CEO James Goodwin said: “The thoughts of everyone at United are with the passengers and crew of these flights. Our prayers are also with everyone on the ground who may have been involved.
“United is working with all the relevant authorities, including the FBI, to obtain further information on these flights,” he said.
______
The above story is located at the following web archive
Original Link Here

Comment
Dick Allgire
5-5-6
Hello Eric,
I read the story posted on Rense.com attributed to you:
Flt 93 Landed in Cleveland Morning of 911
I am a television news reporter in Honolulu with over 30 years experience in journalism. I am gradually coming around to the idea that something is really fishy about the official 9/11 story. As Jeff Rense advises I have been reading and studying and trying to sort out fact from fiction. I do not actively investigate 911 professionally. (No local TV station, especially in Hawaii is going to touch that story.) But I am interested personally.
I had heard the story about Flight 93 landing in Cleveland, yet I had no way to know whether or not it was true. Recently I watched a program on The History Channel about how difficult it was to ground all the airliners in the air over and entering US airspace on 9/11. This program showed a DELTA airlines 767 that landed at Cleveland on that day. It was surrounded by SWAT teams, searched, and the passengers offloaded. The DELTA jet was then cleared. The video (I don’t believe is doctored) clearly shows a DELTA jet.
I am not a debunker. I am sincerely curious and willing to accept the truth. Is it possible that the 767 referred to in your report is the Delta Airlines jet and not United Fl. 93?
This issue of 911 truth is very important. If the official story is not true (I believe it is not) then this country is really in trouble. So we have to be sure about everything that is reported.
Thanks,
Dick Allgire
Honolulu, HI

http://www.rense.com/

TRUE DEMOCRACY FALL 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS 9/11/01

http://www.truedemocracy.net/td13/contents.html

9/11 Flight 93 Landed At Cleveland Airport ….

Then Disappeared Flying To Camp David

At 11:43 am the morning of 9/11, the following Associated Press news bulletin appeared on the Web site for Cincinnati ABC affiliate station WCPO

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtUu2-s3Ei0

United Flight 93 DID NOT CRASH IN SHANKSVILLE,PA PROOF!!

This video will show you the proof that on 9/11 UA flight 93 did not crash in shanksville, if you cant see it for yourself after seeing this video …

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nE7WWAFWiY

Flight 93 Why Did It Crash Instead of

Hitting Its Intended Destination?

by Arlene Johnson

Why was Flight 93 blown up instead of allowing it to hit its destination? Because there were NO PEOPLE on it. Here’s why I know that. My flight landed safely at 10:30 A.M. in Buffalo, NY. It wasn’t blown up because there were people on it. In fact, it was a nearly full flight despite the fact that it left Seatac airport at 3:15 A.M. on September 11, 2001.

The government had 19 Arab names so to make it look like these are terrorists, the U.S. government decided to use those names (six of whom have not even been in the United States now for several months) to create terror among the American people. It worked.

This is not to say that the government doesn’t blow up airplanes which do have people on them because it has done that any number of times and for varying reasons but this was not the case that day.

On my flight the flight attendants told us at about 9:30 A.M. that we would not be able to land at our intended destination which was JFK airport because of the tragedy which we watched on airline television and that we had to land as soon as we could so we landed at 10:30 A. M. Flight 93 was blown out of the sky at 10:06 A.M. more proof that my plane which was a Jet Blue flight was never a target or I wouldn’t be here to tell you about it.

The reason why there were so few names on Flight 93 is because that way the authorities wouldn’t have that many names to account for. I theorize that these people who the U.S. government said were on that flight were relocated and given new identities by the government, which does that periodically, and are perfectly safe.

Ken Thomas commented that one of the people who was ostensibly on that flight is a product of Wheaton College in Illinois, a bastion of Republican brainwashing and a person for whom Ken Thomas has no respect.

There are over 1,100 people in detention. No one has ever stated who they are but I suspect that they are people who would tell the truth if they were free. One of my contacts is a person in a prison in Texas. In a conversation with him, he stated unequivocally that an Iranian was brought to the prison after the September 11, 2001 tragedy.

This missile was at least 5 x 2 feet ( 152 x 61 cm). Vieques, Puerto Rico
Two reporters were arrested because they got too close to the crash scene because they would have seen that there were no bodies in the crash and therefore no bodies to be transported to the morgue or to area hospitals. The government just said there were victims one of whom made a cell phone call to his wife via AT&T. We all know that many people have cell phones in the United States. So why didn’t more people make cell phone calls? Because there were no people on the flight.

Witnesses said that there was a low flying jet, an unmarked white jet from which the person felt she had to duck because it was so low. This surely is the jet which blew up Flight 93.

Why would the government target Arabs? Arabs are mostly Muslims, a religion which is a severe threat to capitalism. Why is it a severe threat to capitalism? Prophet Muhammad was a salesman; he believed in profit but not the gargantuan profit that capitalism requires with “larger and larger profits.” [See first edition, True Democracy: The Trilateral Commission: Effect on the Middle East, page 1]

This is such conclusive proof that all those flights were unmanned and controlled by Global Hawk because my flight was perfectly safe.

TRUE DEMOCRACY FALL 2001 Copyright © 2001 by News Sourse, Inc.

TOP Secret Government Facility (holds Flight 93 evidence)

May 25, 2007 Mary Nam of KOMO 4, profiles Iron Mountain’s underground facility in Pennsylvania

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aou6c2MOmg