911 Commissioner Slips Up Pentagon Struck by Missile
Posted by: “C Greenwood” email@example.com protectingconnie
Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:35 am (PST)
— On Fri, 1/16/09, norgesen <norgeson@hotmail. com> wrote:
911 Commissioner Slips Up: Pentagon Struck by Missile
The Existentialist Cowboy
January 11, 2009
Tim Roemer has let the cat out of the bag,
referring as did Donald Rumsfeld to a ‘missile’ that struck the Pentagon. In
addition, there were the early news reports before ‘officialdom’ was able to
insist that the media report ONLY the official conspiracy theory. Those early
reports consisted of anchors like Dan Rather and Peter Jennings talking about
‘controlled demolitions’ , field reporters declaring that no airliner had struck
the Pentagon, and, of course, the famous BBC report that WTC7 had fallen even as
it was seen still standing behind the
9/11 commissioner slips up: Missile hit Pentagon
Earlier, FBI Director Robert Mueller said,
there is no evidence to connect the ‘said’ 19 ‘hijackers’ with
the events of 911. Indeed, several of the ‘hijackers’ were interviewed by the
BBC after they were said to have died in the attacks.
A very serious ‘nail in officialdom’ s coffin’ is the fact that Flight 77
was at at altitude of 273 feet at the time of the so-called ‘crash’ into the
Pentagon. That puts Flight 77 over 200 feet ABOVE the Pentagon within about half
a second of the impact.
The only plausible explanation is that whatever
really struck the Pentagon approached by
way of the light poles and at an altitude that, in fact, allowed it to strike
and damage the poles enroute. Whatever that was it was not Flight 77 which was
higher up at the time and on a completely different trajectory.
might have taken a route that clipped the light poles enroute to the Pentagon.
Certainly, Flight 77 approached from another altitude and at an angle that would
have completely missed the poles even if
had been at the lower altitude.
This is a critical point. A single
aircraft could not have damaged BOTH the poles AND the Pentagon from the
trajectory that the flight data records for Flight 77. Flight 77 was, in
fact, too high at 273 feet. The DOD witnesses, in fact, did not, could not have
seen whatever it was that struck both the poles and the Pentagon.
The light poles, only about 40 feet high, are about 50 meters from the
Pentagon. At this point the ‘Reagan [airport] beacon’ and the raw flight data
confirm that Flight 77 altitude was never lower than 273 feet. The speed of
Flight 77 at some 50 meters was over 500 mph. Even if Flight 77 had been on a
trajectory to strike the poles, it would have flown over them. Flight 77 would have flown over the
Pentagon on either trajectory.
Could Flight 77 have simply leveled off?
Bluntly –no! Flight 77 had only a half
second to two seconds in which to dive a couple of hundred feet and then level
off thus accounting for both the light pole damage and the hit into the Pentagon. [Aerodynamics Simulation Software] Such a maneuver is outside manufacturers
specifications, simply, impossible in that aircraft. Moreover, had
that happened the 757 would not have been seen by the eyewitnesses who could
ONLY have seen it on the other trajectory.
http://video. google.com/ googleplayer. swf?docid= 2833924626286859 522
Douglas presents his investigation into the flight data recorder from Flight
the Indian YMCA in Fitzroy Square, London on 8th June 2007.
It is also ‘outside the performance envelope’ of one Hani Hanjour who 1)
trained on a simulator and, in fact, had never set foot inside a 757; 2) was
said by the Washington Post to have never boarded Flight 77 in the first place.
Again –to make the point: there is absolutely no evidence that Hani Hanjour was
ever on Flight 77.
The Washington Post said that Hani Hanjour did not
have a ticket! Nor was his name was on the original flight manifest. Flight
manifests are not official. They are simply a head count done by staff.
It is doubtful that a flight manifest would be admissible in court. A coroner’s
report, however, is considered to be evidence. It’s official.
Hani Hanjour is not listed
among those who were autopsied.
Even idiots of the GOP must admit that nothing can be in two places at
the same time unless the laws of physics as described by both Einstein and
Newton have been repealed.
There are two reasons for believing Bush, his NEOCON co-conspirators,
various Pentagon brass, and complicit murderers inside the MIC are responsible
for perpetrating the treasonous, murderous crime of 911: 1) Bush has never told
the truth about 911; 2) Bush has consistently and deliberately tried to cover up
the crime with identifiable instances of obstruction of justice, lies, and overt
Bush had method. He
had at his disposal the US military and the intelligence apparatus of the CIA in
order to ‘pull off’ 911. His ‘old man’ –Bush Sr –had been Director of the CIA
and most certainly had ‘connections’ , perhaps a constituency loyal to him and
powerful elites to whom the senior Bush may still be beholden.
motive. He benefited from 911 as no other
single person could have. A ‘base’ of filthy rich elites got even richer short
selling airline stocks. A neocon base benefited in numerous ways but primarily
the elevation of their radical politics to policy. The oil companies that made
up Dick Cheney’s ‘Energy Task Force’ may have benefited most of all. They were
prepared to carve up the oil fields of the Middle East.
Bush had the
opportunity to order and ‘supervise’ 911
by way of co-conspirators Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld. That’s method, motive
and opportunity –more than enough to get you a lethal, injected cocktail for
much less ambitious and malevolent crimes in the fascist, gulag state of Texas.
Bush’s opposition to the creation of the 911 Commission, his orders to
destroy evidence at the Pentagon and at ‘ground zero’, his interference with the
911 Commission, his ongoing cover up are
not the actions of an innocent man. Had Bush wanted the truth out, he
would have supported a complete, fair, and impartial investigation. That was, of
course, the last thing Bush wanted.
[See: Northrop-Grumman: RQ-4 Block 20 Global Hawk]
There are no hijacker names on the pathologists report released in
response to an FOIA request. There is, therefore, no evidence that Hanjour’s
remains were autopsied, no evidence that his remains were even recovered or
buried in Arlington National Cemetery. More to the point, there is absolutely no
evidence that Hani Hanjour was at any time on any flight connected with 911.
As pointed out, the Washington Post reported
that Hanjour was not on Flight 77 because he did not have a ticket. It’s hard to
imagine short, skinny Hanjour forcing his way on board and having done so,
taking over the controls with force and a boxcutter! It’s a ludicrous story on
its face. It simply did not happen and there is not a shred of evidence in
support of it –let alone proof. You don’t get past the gate without a boarding
pass. You don’t get a boarding pass without a ticket. The ‘official’ account is pure and utter
A 757 airliner is a civilian craft, not a nuclear powered
craft. It does not carry a nuclear war head or hardened nose cone. Had a 757
crashed the Pentagon there would have been no need to order decontamination
procedures. No such procedures were carried out in New York, but were carried
out at the Pentagon. Clearly, ‘officials’ knew at the time that a civilian
airliner had not crashed the Pentagon. The only scenario that fully explains the
necessity of decontamination procedures is that of a military craft crashing
into the Pentagon. It is my belief that that is what happened in fact. Don’t try
to tell me that such procedures are just routine. They were not routine in New
York and were not carried out!
A set of related facts are explained by ‘theories’ which must, of
necessity, explain every relevant fact. Theories inconsistent with
proven facts must be discarded as false. Bush’s theory explains
nothing and is inconsistent with established science. By contrast, a technology
called ‘Global Hawk’ may very well explain the seemingly inexplicable events of
911 and, at the same time, point an accusing finger.
The Global Hawk is operated by remote control. The US, in fact,
outfitted an aircraft with Global Hawk technology and flew it –without a pilot
–from California to Australia by remote control. No Arab hijackers were
required! The Global Hawk, moreover, would have had no problems with the
maneuver credited to Hanjour but which experienced pilots say is impossible in a
A Global Hawk has only one engine rotor and it is of the size of
the ONLY rotor to have been found in the
Pentagon debris. Had a 757 crashed into the Pentagon TWO rotors each about three
times that size would have been found. They were not! And that’s because a 757
DID NOT strike the Pentagon. The burden of proof is upon those who have asserted
that an airliner struck the Pentagon. It is time for those who continue to make
that assertion to prove it, or, at the very, very least support it with a
scintilla of verifiable evidence. The black-hearted liars who continue to
espouse that absurd theory have not only no proof but no evidence in their
With a wingspan of over 116 ft the Global Hawk would
have had no problem clipping the four damaged pole, skimming just above the
pristine lawn, crashing into a portion of the Pentagon that was undergoing
extensive renovations at the time. At the very instant of the crash, Flight 77
as above it all at 273 feet.
It’s not enough that the Bush administration actively covered up evidence
even as it sought to quash every investigation of 911, Bush and Condoleeza Rice
would lie about the event after the fact, specifically, both Bush and Condo
stated that the crashing of airliners into buildings could not have been
foreseen, were not foreseen. [Bush: No evidence that US could avoid 9/11] Bush lied!
And so did Condo Rice:
Today’s Sydney Morning Herald prints an extract from Shenon’s book
which provides further details about Rice’s incompetence. “Emails from the
National Security Council’s counter-terrorism director, Richard Clarke, showed
that he had bombarded Rice with messages about terrorist threats”
before 9/11, Shenon writes. In fact, just such a
‘scenario’ was the basis for security when Bush attended the G8 Summit in Italy, July 23, 2001 [See: “Italy:
Bush Targeted at G8.” New York Newsday 19 Sept 2001, unsigned;
“Extremists ‘Planned Genoa Attack on Bush'”, BBC News, 27 Sept 2001].
Secondly, Dick Cheney supervised precisely that scenario on the
very day that it happened in fact –a highly improbable coincidence’
that would repeat later in Britain on 7/7. Cheney supervised what are called
‘exercises’ within a bunker –the Presidential Emergency Operations Center
–located under the White House. There is damning testimony against Cheney from
former Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta who contradicts 9/11 Commission Report’s Account of
Dick Cheney’s timetable.
The Probable Cause to Charge Dick
Cheney With Mass Murder, Terrorism, and High Treason
That’s not all. Cheney had already been put in
charge of a ‘domestic terrorism study group’ [See: 911
Coincidences] , a clever cover from which to commit high treason and
Since those events, the Bush administration has worked overtly,
assiduously to quash and interfere with every effort to investigate fully the
events of 911. Only guilty people do that.
# Scot J. Paltrow, “Government Accounts of 9/11 Reveal Gaps,
Inconsistencies. Questions Arise About Who Put Nation on High Alert; A Threat
to Air Force One? Panel Assembles Timeline,” –Wall Street Journal, March 22, 2004.
Condoleezza Rice, “9/11: For The Record,” Washington Times,
March 22, 2004: “Despite what some have suggested, we received no intelligence
that terrorists were preparing to attack the homeland using airplanes as
missiles, though some analysts speculated that terrorists might hijack
airplanes to try to free US-held terrorists.” Also see “Promoting Icon Condi” in the August 4, 2003,
–National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
– SourceWatch Rice’s statements were bald faced lies and
only the guilty try to cover up their crimes.
If the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated or at least deliberately
allowed by the Bush- Cheney administration and the Pentagon, then the
motivation to cover up this murderous and treasonous act would be
unlimited. No expenditure of time and money would be considered too
–Professor David Ray Griffin , The True Story of 9/11: Part IVBy this
time, everyone in America should know that alleged ‘plane crashes’ into the Twin
Towers could not and did not result in
their collapses. Descriptions by numerous witnesses, including that of
professional firefigters describe controlled demolitions and thermite/thermate
fires which burned for weeks. Ordinary fires can be extinguished with sand by
robbing the fire of oxygen, but if one covered a thermite fire with tons of
sand, the reaction, the fire would not stop. Certainly that was the case at WTC
where the fires burned ‘slowly and more moderately for weeks’. Jet fuel fires
are spent very quickly. They do not continue to burn for weeks. I’ve covered
airliner fires but never one which
continued to burn for days, let alone weeks! Most fires were spent by the time
reporters arrived on the scene. That fact alone disproves the official bullshit
On videos, molten steel can be seen streaming down the outer walls. The
relatively cool kerosene fires were already spent by this time and could not
have melted steel in any case.
In summary, the first reporters on the scene at both the Pentagon and the
so-called ‘crash site’ in PA were correct. There
was NO airliner debris at either location. The narrow ditch at PA could
not have accommodated a 757 and, in fact, did not. The ditch was most probably
created by the backhoe that was seen in the very earliest photos from the PA
It is LUDICROUS to suppose that Flight 93 buried itself underground
leaving mere scraps topside. [See: Hoodwinked at Shanksville] . If Flight 93 buried itself
like a gopher, then let’s excavate that site. Let us find out where all that
missing debris is. If there is an airliner down there, let’s dig it up. We have
the technology to do it: backhoes and shovels. In the meantime, check out the
how the Bush government’s ‘best case’ for the Flight 93 scenario is proven to
have been a cynical fraud:
BREAKING 9/11 NEWS: FBI Says Barbara Olsen Did Not Call Ted Olsen.
Bush Solicitor General LIED !!
There are no longer any reasons to believe any
aspect of the Bush official cover story. Only idiots –on the one hand –and
guilty conspirators on the other will put forward the official conspiracy theory
with a straight face.
On 911, our ‘government’ declared war on the people of the United States
and, thus, became illegitimate. As Che would have put it: the peace is already considered to be broken.
Thomas Jefferson would have already declared ‘our’ independence of a cabal that
has, in effect, already destroyed the ‘legitimate’ government of the United
States. I am not sure that the election of Obama is by itself enough to restore
legitimacy. Perhaps, if every traitor and every traitorous, criminal accomplice
were charged and brought to justice!
Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only
in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid
and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony
of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
–Article III, US ConstitutionThe word treason
covers the more egregious acts of betrayal or disloyalty to a sovereign
or nation. Under the US Constitution and, in Britain by common law,
sovereignty resides with the people themselves. What had been called
the “United States” no longer exists. It was, in fact, overthrown in Bush’s
coup d’etat, and since that time systematically subverted and
dismantled by Bush and his gang of treasonous usurpers. Accomplices who must
certainly stand trial with Bush and Cheney will include Donald Rumsfeld,
Condoleeza Rice, and various Pentagon brass.
There is, therefore, no admissible evidence that supports the absurd
cover story that ‘Arab hijackers’ pulled off 911. At the Pentagon, for example,
the ‘official coronorers’ report was released to Dr. Olmsted in response to his
FOIA request. There was not a single ‘Arab’ or hijacker name on the
While there is no verifiable evidence to support Bush’s version of 911,
there is probable cause to indict Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleeza Rice and
numerous others for the crimes of mass murder and high treason. Let’s get on
with the indictments, arrests, and trials. We tried Nazis at Nuremberg. Will we
prove to the world what heinous hypocrites we are if we let ‘out own’ get away
with precisely the same crimes?
http://www.youtube. com/v/0k4B6C60an 0
911: Inside Job Update [Thanks, windharps]!
Hat tip: Le The Chez Vierotchka