911 Crash Test Org

Travis J. Walker via 9/11 Crash Test
September 11 at 12:25pm
Check out this article at link below

This is taken from our website http://911crashtest.org/  and was written 2 years ago by 9/11 Crash Test founder Steve De’ak. R.A.W.W. is re-posting this information with his permission for the upcoming 13th anniversary of the attacks at the World Trade Center (WTC Twin Towers) on September 11th, 2001 in an attempt to raise awareness on the “real” truth of 9/11. If you read through this information and watch these videos and are not convinced of at least the plausibility of Steve’s theory then maybe it is time for some soul searching.

This information has no propaganda, no lies, no half-truths, no hidden agenda, and no mainstream media spin. What it has are the proven Law’s of Physics as discovered by Sir Isaac Newton, common sense, and a bit of critical thinking. Put aside everything you “believe” about 9/11 and open your mind to the truth.

There are events that happen that change your life forever. 9/11 was one of those events. And it not only changed your life forever, but the lives of literally everyone on this planet.

There have been 2 illegal wars waged, 100,000’s (if not millions) of innocent people murdered, and untold emotional and physical damage done; all justified by this most heinous event. There have also been many draconian laws, bills, and executive orders passed because of 9/11 such as: USA Patriot Act, Department of Homeland Security, NDAA, as well as many others that have usurped the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights.

All the while, consolidating power of the president effectively making him a war-time dictator. And all of this because of 9/11!

We would be willing to bet that all of YOU (that were old enough to understand what was happening) can remember exactly where YOU were, what YOU were doing, and who YOU where with when YOU found out about the attacks on 9/11.

If an event was (and still is) this important and changed YOURS and so many others lives, don’t YOU think YOU should know the truth about what really happened and bring the people who were responsible for the loss of all these innocent lives to justice?

Keep an open mind, use your ration NOT your ego or emotions, and see what you think after studying this information…

‪#‎WTC‬ ‪#‎TwinTowers‬ ‪#‎911CrashTest‬ ‪#‎NineEleven‬ ‪#‎SeptemberEleventh‬ ‪#‎WorldTradeCenter‬ ‪#‎NoPlanes‬ ‪#‎NYC‬ ‪#‎NY‬ ‪#‎BillofRights‬ ‪#‎Conspiracy‬ ‪#‎FalseFlag‬

Would You Like to See a New Investigation Into 9/11?
As an alternative to beating our heads against the same brick wall, what would happen if an exciting laboratory experiment were conducted that proved 9/11 is a lie, thereby exposing the media as an…

New York’s new 9-11 investigation could stop global holocaust

The Middle East is teetering on the brink of disaster.

Kevin Barrett

Israel is slaughtering Palestinian families and children in Gaza. Hamas fires rockets at Israel. The too-extreme-for-al-Qaeda ISIL terrorists massacre civilians and announce an ersatz caliphate in Iraq and Syria.

New York’s new 9 11 investigation could stop global holocaust

The world’s biggest military behemoth, the USA, with 4,650 nuclear warheads, backs the Zionist and ISIL terrorists; while Russia, with its 3,281 nuclear weapons, stands strong against American bullying. Russia has drawn the line in Syria, announcing: No more regime change! Meanwhile the Israelis, with an estimated 400 nuclear warheads, are a regional wild card and a global menace.

On the eastern border of the Middle East sit Pakistan and India, with over 100 nuclear warheads each. The election of Indian anti-Muslim extremist Prime Minister Narendra Modi has ratcheted up tensions between the South Asian rivals; while the Zionist-backed US destabilization of Pakistan through false flag “Pakistani Taliban” terror makes this dangerous situation even worse.

Ongoing Middle East and South Asian conflicts could easily spin out of control, triggering global armageddon. It could happen in any number of ways.

The most probable scenario hinges on a big Israeli false flag. The Zionists have been masters of false-flag terror since they dressed up as Arabs and bombed the King David hotel on July 22nd, 1946. Since then, they have:

*Dressed up as Arabs and bombed US targets in Egypt in 1954 (the Lavon Affair).

*Conspired to frame Egypt for the attempted murder of hundreds of American sailors aboard the USS Liberty in 1967.

*Orchestrated the “Palestinian terrorist” hijacking of the Achille Lauro cruise ship, and the murder of American citizen Leon Klinghoffer, in 1985.

*Bombed their own embassies in London in 1994 and Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1992.

*Bombed the Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aires in 1994.

*Conspired with American traitors to bomb the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in 2001.

*Likely conspired in follow-up bombings in Bali (2002), Madrid (2004), London (2005) and elsewhere.

And these are just a few of the Zionist false flags we know about. There have undoubtedly been dozens of others.

As former lead BBC Mideast correspondent Alan Hart says, the hard-line Zionists around Netanyahu want to start a big Mideast war. This would allow them to finish the ethnic cleansing of Palestine.

Such a war could begin with a false flag attack from Gaza. Israel could have its assets fire a rocket with chemical weapons from Gaza into Tel Aviv. Israel could blame Iran, pulverize Gaza and the West Bank, attack Iran, and watch a firestorm of missiles rain down upon it. This could provide an excuse for the “final solution” ethnic cleansing. (Or it could just as easily backfire and lead to Israel’s annihilation.)

Worse yet, such a scenario, or dozens like it, could provoke World War III. The US might enter such a war to save Israel; and Russia might enter to prevent the US from bloodily imposing its will on the region. Nuclear weapons could begin to fly. Humanity would face a catastrophe of unprecedented proportions.

Many people feel helpless in the face of such threats. They passively hope that their leaders will behave sensibly and prevent the worst case scenarios from transpiring.

Such passivity in the face of impending armageddon is immoral – if not clinically insane.

Fortunately many people are sacrificing their time, energy and money to try to stop that runaway train, the Armageddon Express. Perhaps the most important group working to change history for the better, at this moment, is NYCcan.org.

NYCcan.org is heading for success in its efforts to force New York City to re-investigate the “collapse” of World Trade Center Building 7. On the afternoon of September 11th, 2001, the 47-story high rise known as WTC-7 disappeared straight into its own footprint in 6.5 seconds. Europe’s leading demolition expert, Danny Jowenko, announced on television that the destruction of WTC-7 was an obvious controlled demolition. Not long after that, he was killed in a suspicious automobile crash.

The most important witness to the demolition of WTC-7, Barry Jennings, also appears to have been murdered as part of a 9/11 “clean-up operation.”

The 9/11 Commission Report did not even mention the destruction of WTC-7 – the biggest and most important national security building in New York, and the site of the CIA’s second biggest headquarters after Langley, Virginia. American network television was ordered never to show the “collapse” of WTC-7 for more than five years after 9/11. That is because WTC-7 is the achilles heel of the official myth. The minute any fair-minded person examines the strange case of WTC-7, the entire official version of 9/11 collapses, revealing the horrible truth: The murderous attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon was an all-too-obvious, and badly botched, false flag operation.

NYCcan.org has found an ingenious way to force a new investigation of WTC-7. They are working to have New York voters enact the High Rise Safety Initiative, which would force the New York Department of Buildings to investigate the destruction of Building 7. And now that Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth has acquired the blueprints for WTC-7, there is simple, straightforward slam-dunk proof that the US government agency NIST lied when it attributed the demolition of Building 7 to modest office fires.

A new WTC-7 investigation will, at the very least, badly embarrass the US government. It might even blow 9/11 wide open.

As the truth emerges, the alliance of hardline US imperialism and Zionism that staged 9/11 will implode at free-fall speed. This is the same alliance that is committing aggression in the Middle East and South Asia and risking global nuclear war. Removing the 9/11 criminals from power will lower the risk of global nuclear holocaust from close to 100% to something vastly lower.

No other issue has even remotely the kind of pro-peace leverage that 9/11 truth has. There is no other path of activism in which an individual’s contribution to peace, truth and justice can have this kind of potential impact.

If the 9/11 criminals continue waging war on the world, the world is doomed. If you don’t make an effort to stop them, you are complicit. It really is that simple.

Please go to NYCcan.org and contribute what you can. The survival of humanity depends on it.

http://www.pakalertpress.com/2014/07/12/new-yorks-new-911-investigation-could-stop-global-holocaust/

911 CBS WTC nuclear demolition man

911 CBS WTC nuclear demolition man with construction helmet in WTC-7 lobby

Excerpt from NIST FOIA Raw CBS 9/11 WTC Footage (05.26 – 09.19 from the footage / 10.16 – 10.19 real 9/11 time). I thank my friend, YouTube user WTCNUKED for it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pp2SC_aduTA

15 minutes after the first Twin Tower’s collapse, CBS camera-man runs into the building 7’s lobby.

The alarm sound here is distinctly different from alarms of fire-engines and ambulances heard outside.

I think it was the WTC nuclear demolition alarm.

A “certain” alarm system existed in the WTC-7 and transmitted “certain” signals towards the rest of the WTC complex.

The transmission of it was turned off at 6.47 AM September 11, 2001, and this was due to last 8 hours. (Source: NIST, “Interim Findings And Accomplishments”, in Progress Report on the Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center, Vol.1.,28.).

The CBS reporter encounters a certain Mr. Bennette who wears a VRU hood (the VRU hood is intended as a means of breath protection against bio- and chemical- hazards and could be as well used for protection against radioactive dust and radioactive vapor).

Mr. Bennette in a remarkably calm and composed manner (considering the unprecedented collapse of the South Tower only 15 minutes ago that supposed to horrify everyone, servicemen inclusive) urges the man to leave and says that everyone has already gone from the building 7 and only he remained there to control that nobody goes “downstairs”

(since he urges the CBS man to leave the WTC-7 and the way to leave it is apparently downstairs, it should be presumed that by saying “that nobody goes downstairs” Mr. Bennette obviously means some underground premises, not simply the way down out of the WTC-7 lobby).

Mr. Bennette refuses to elaborate, but tells the CBS reporter his surname and admits to be from the Secret Service.

The most incriminating thing, however, is that in his left hand Mr. Bennette holds a typical construction helmet — a highly unusual thing to be worn by the Secret Service personnel

(especially considering that the supposedly “unexpected” collapse of the South Tower has occurred only 15 minutes ago, while the collapse of the North Tower was yet to happen).

The Secret Service folks could, perhaps, wear steel combat helmets, in a certain situation, but not the plastic contraction helmets…

The plastic construction helmets are typically worn only by construction workers (Mr. Bennette is apparently not the one) and by… demolition men (perhaps, in this particular case also by nuclear demolition men).

Judging by elementary logic, it should be presumed Mr. Bennette was also a part of the WTC demolition team — considering the fact that he was issued the construction helmet (do you know that members of demolition teams typically wear construction helmets?)

I hope you got the point…

If you watch this video attentively enough, you will notice one more interesting (if, again, not an outright incriminating) detail: at 2.03-2.06 from the beginning of this clip Mr. Bennette says in regard to the South Tower collapse:

“…I haven’t seen outside the building [WTC-7] yet…”

And yet, despite he has not been outside the WTC-7 yet, Mr. Bennette (with the construction helmet in his hand) shows remarkable knowledge regarding the details of the South Tower collapse that just happened 15 minutes ago…

In my opinion, considering that Mr. Bennette was apparently involved with the Twin Towers’ demolition (hence the construction helmet) he should be from now on called “nuclear demolition man” — to distinguish him from other important 9/11 personalities; he deserves this title, apparently.

I upload this important file to my web hosting 911-truth.net as usual; the file-name is
http://911_CBS_WTC-demolition-man_from_Secret_Service_with_construction_helmet_15min_after_South_Tower_collapse_in_WTC­-7_lobby.mp4
Everyone is encouraged to get, to re-upload and to redistribute this important file as widely as possible, followed by the description of mine.

Sincerely yours,
Dimitri Khalezov.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyYms4J5s98

911 CBS WTC nuclear demolition man

COMMENTS

FolkPhotographer

The Death of Controlled Demolition Expert Danny Jowenko after Speaking about 9/11 WTC 7 Building 7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zHHvo6U4lA

http://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/wtc-constructed-to-be-nuclear-device-chimneys/
Reply
·
Adam Smith
3 weeks ago

whats VRU stand for? on his bag?
Reply
·
bur lapse
1 month ago

So this secret service guy is prepared with an anti radiation cap? Or is that just a normal plastic cap?? anyone??
Reply
·
Tom E
1 month ago

The horn is an older style Autocall fire alarm system  the ding are a zone coding pattern telling building operators what and where the fire alarm was generated.

As for it not sounding like other buildings in NYC since the entire WTC was owned by the PANYNJ it was not require to be in conformance to NYC or NYS building codes. if it were the fire alarm sound would be a slow whoop.

As for a demolition hard hat….  that would be a RED hat….. ?
Reply
·
thebluetarp
1 month ago

its so funny, folks who are in total denial of the unbelievably obvious feel a need to attack and criticize those of us who are smart and have common sense. its ok people, you too can have smarts and common sense. try learning some history and try learning some facts oh….and the most important thing….use your common sense. what does your common sense tell you. its right most of the time. the tin foil hat comments are getting so old and tired…?
Reply
·
gary barker
2 months ago

apparently If u build a sky scraper in ny ..u have to show how u would bring it down …the way they come down dosnt look like normal demolition ..def isn’t because of planes…the best one iv heard is a nuc being underneath the towers …makes sense as to how they dissappered … and just blew away ….?
Reply
·
1
digginya Cashgreen
4 months ago

Yes, he does say it: “I don’t know, I haven’t been OUTSIDE YET”    Where has he
been? Inside this building since before the whole “Event Began” because that’s clearly what it sounds like…??

There’s a “Live Report” by a British Reporter broadcast live back to the UK! She’s standing on a building giving her report live to the UK Public & she says”All 3 building have fallen” & You can Clearly SEE, Building # 7 over her shoulder, STILL STANDING! 5 sec’s later, UK says, “We’ve Lost Her Feed”!  Building #7 fell about 33 minutes later.

I’ve seen this footage but most our Public NEVER saw that, Else they might have questioned this more??? I don’t know what happened that day but it was bad & there seems to be major chunks of this story, yet to be “Out in the Open” thus Truth has been obscured for some reason…..?   peace to All ?
Reply
·
9/11 Nuclear Demolition

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0x7ms5hUudHBATxKvBO4xQ/feed
5 months ago

Good to see William Bennette on Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=628244277195197&set=pb.100000288909692.-2207520000.1389121653.&type=3&theater
Reply
·
4
9/11 Nuclear Demolition
2 months ago

Futhermore, see his ball cap in the pic above and how it says “MTA”. William Bennette now drives a bus for the “MTA” (Metropolitan Transportation Authority). http://new-york-employees.findthebest.com/l/521634/William-A-Bennette?
Reply
·
2
thebluetarp
6 months ago

building 7 was clearly demolished. it does not take a rocket scientist to figure this out. the real question should be, why are we being lied to about it. NIST even stated officially they do not have an explanation for the collapse. fires would not cause a building to melt like it did. many buildings have burned for 3 days straight and have never collapsed. the second question then needs to be, how in the hell were they able to rig it for demo in under 8 hours. or was it pre-rigged? if so, why??
Reply
·
5
View all 29 replies

Denierbud11
6 months ago

The FDNY would disagree with you observation, they thought the building was in danger of collapse and evacuated the zone.?
Reply
·
ChakatBlackstar
6 months ago

Most burning buildings also weren’t sitting next to a pair of collapsing towers. I’m more amazed more buildings didn’t come down.?
Reply
·
thebluetarp
6 months ago

Man, these comments just solidify how stupid as a country we have become! I feel sorry for both of you. Building 7 suffered very little damage from falling debris. Do your homework. It was one of the strongest sturdiest buildings ever built.

The official government sponsored explanation is that an office fire brought the building down.

I am laughing typing this. You both need to wake up. This loyalty to a beast such as our federal government with an unlimited amount of money needs to stop.

We as a people should never believe a word they say. Its our constitutional duty! They should prove themselves worthy of our loyalty everyday! Understand? QUESTION EVERYTHING!!!!!?
Reply
·
4
Denierbud11
6 months ago

“It was one of the strongest sturdiest buildings ever built.”  — bet to can’t back this statement with facts?
Reply
·
ChakatBlackstar
6 months ago

+thebluetarp
was it built to withstand a small earthquake? Because with the force of those two towers falling next to it, that’s basically what it was put through?
Reply
·
Denierbud11
5 months ago

+thebluetarp still waiting for you to support the claim WTC 7 was one of the strongest buildings ever constructed ?
Reply
·
thebluetarp
5 months ago

HUH? do you not have access to the world wide web? what a stupid statement. building 7 was built as a bunker for certain elite people in addition to being a super strong structure. regardless, buildings dont melt due to fires. end of discussion. and the damage sustained by falling debri was not going to make it melt either. face it friend, we are being lied to. its a tough pill to swallow?
Reply
·
2
Denierbud11
5 months ago

WTC 7 was not built as a bunker!  the Bunker for command and controll was added much later, and proved to be unprotected — there is no evidence WTC 7 was hardened in any manner – feel free to provide facts rather than unsupported claims.?
Reply
·
Denierbud11
5 months ago

google WTC 7 command bunker and read it for yourself, stupid mischling?
Reply
·
thebluetarp
5 months ago

WHY ARE YOU IN DENIAL OF SOMETHING SO FREAKING OBVIOUS? never in the history of the world has government staged events been so obvious and the people be in such denial of it.

watch the video of building 7 going down and tell me with a straight face its “collapsing” due to fires. the “official” statement from NIST is that fires and NOT building damage brought the building down.

show me a building anywhere in the universe that has collapsed after 10 hours due to a couple small AND I MEAN SMALL office fires. i dare you! IN FACT show me a building that is 100% ENGULFED IN FLAMES THAT COLLAPSES IN 10 HOURS. it never happens! you need to wake up my friend. learn a little history. governments have murdered more civillians than any other group of people by 10 times over…?
Reply
·
1
Denierbud11
5 months ago

The FDNY predicted WTC 7 was going to collapse — they made the call – are you calling them liars??
Reply
·
thebluetarp
5 months ago

EXPLAIN to me seriously how a building collapses from a couple small office fires. and dont quote the popular science research, as their theory is completely wrong.

what they claim the building did is NOT what it did. they claim is twisted and fell inconsistently. when the reality is it went STRAIGHT DOWN at almost freefall speed. just as if all supports were blown at the same time. brother governments have been false flagging us for decades and decades.

why do you think suddenly they are angels and now they would not do it? do they work for us or the money? i think we can both agree the answer is crystal clear. they work for the money.

and when you work for the money, you will do ANYTHING to accomplish your ultimate agenda. sorry, you need to wake up.?
Reply
·
1
ChakatBlackstar
5 months ago

+thebluetarp
Between the fires, the damage from initial impacts, and oh yes, the two skyscrapers collapsing down the street, why are you so surprised that it collapsed?

And how small do you think the fires were? Offices have a ton of kindling to fuel fires, and I’ve seen fires level a building in an hour or two, even with firefighters working on it.?
Reply
·
Denierbud11
5 months ago

+thebluetarp The FDNY does not describe the fires as minor — they state it was fully involved in fire, why the strawman?
?
Reply
·
cicatrixta
2 months ago

+ChakatBlackstar your brain in a dish would resemble a lumpy custard shot through with industrial fluoride.  ?
Reply
·
ChakatBlackstar
2 months ago

+cicatrixta
The appearance of my brain doesn’t change the fact that I’m right.?
Reply
·
cicatrixta
2 months ago

…right out of your mind, yes?
Reply
·
thebluetarp
1 month ago

i will personally mail a check for one thousand dollars for the first person to show me a video of building 7 engulfed in flames as the popular mechanics claims it was.

the only video i have ever seen is a few flames coming out of 2 windows. i dont see that as enough flames to bring down an ENTIRE BUILDING!!!

let alone the fact that fire has NEVER IN THE HISTORY OF MAN HAS FIRE BROUGHT A STEEL STRUCTURE BUILDING DOWN!!! and the damage the building suffered from falling debri was NOT enough to even remotely cause the building to melt. in fact, the only damage of falling debri was a tiny chunk out of one corner.

also, the official NIST investigation RULED OUT FALLING DEBRI AS A CAUSE….OK?!? just because so many of you are denial of the so TOTALLY obvious, does not make it fact. i would say WAKE UP,  but that is so cliche?
Reply
·
ChakatBlackstar
1 month ago

+thebluetarp
“fire has NEVER IN THE HISTORY OF MAN HAS FIRE BROUGHT A STEEL STRUCTURE BUILDING DOWN”

To quote Lex Luthor: “WRONG!” There have in fact been two partial collapeses and if a partial collapse is possible, then a full collapse is possible as shown with WTC 1, 2, 5, and 7

1. One New York Plaza (NY, NY, 08/05/70) – partial collapse
50-story office building. Fire caused several steel filler beams on the 33-34th floors to fall and rest on the bottom flanges of their supporting girders.

2. Alexis Nihon Plaza (Montreal, Canada, 10/26/96) – partial collapse
15-story steel-framed office building. Approximately five hours after the fire started, a section of the 11th floor collapsed onto the 10th floor.

You lose. Good day sir.?
Reply
·
thebluetarp
1 month ago

sorry but I win! still have my thousand dollars. again moron, send me a photo, a video, anything showing more than a single window or 2 with flames.

if fire brought down WTC7, show me a single shot of that building engulfed in flames! or for that matter more than 2 windows of flames. also while your at it, another thousand for a single video of an actual commercial jet hitting the pentagon.

i already know this can not be done, so iam waisting my time but its entertaining to hear people defend and be loyal to people who do not give a rats about you. its actually quite sad and pathetic. your loyalty to known criminals and known cumpulsive liars is sad and disgusting. the government should fear the people, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND.?
Reply
·
thebluetarp
1 month ago

oh and one more thing, both of your examples neither building actually collapsed. as the bottom structure was not burned. and they certainly did not melt at nearly freefall speed. come on dude,

WAKE THE FUCK UP.

you sound so pathetic defending pathalogical liers. i suppose you still believe the gulf of tonkin was a real attack too even though it has now been admitted to be a government staged event.?
Reply
·
thebluetarp
1 month ago

+Denierbud11
to quote the FDNY they said “they would be bringing the building down”, they never said a thing about it collapsing. buildings dont collapse from 2 small office fires. wake up yo!?
Reply
·
ChakatBlackstar
1 month ago

+thebluetarp
You fail on so many levels. I’ve seen a building appear to be fine one moment, then seemingly burst into flames from out of nowhere, because the fire was inside the structure rather then lapping away at the walls or windows. It doesn’t take a massive-all-engulfing fire to destroy a building.

As for the pentagon video, all you had to do was look on youtube. One of the first results shows a plane hitting the Pentagon: Plane Hits The Pentagon?
Reply
·
Sean Mezzo
1 week ago

+Denierbud11 Never in the history of steel skyscrapers has one come down from a mere fire – a fire that, mind you, was mostly out prior to it being “pulled”. ?
Reply
·
ChakatBlackstar
1 week ago

+Sean Mezzo
Never in the history of steel skyscrapers has one, much less two been rammed by a pair of fully loaded 767’s. Even if the fire had been completely out, they still might have come down, because the steel had already been weakened.?
Reply
·
Sean Mezzo
6 days ago

Now, what about building 6? This was not even investigated at all by NIST. It has a bomb size crader. And curiously, there are first repsonders with radiation sickness. Riddle me this.?
Reply
·
ChakatBlackstar
6 days ago

+Sean Mezzo
citation that.?
Reply
·
Sean Mezzo
2 days ago

It’s really all over. And I would agree regarding 7 specifically in regard to damage vs. FDNY decision to “pull it” and also “bunker”- like build. If you go online, Larry Silverstein (who held the lease on the twin towers as well, had recently done extensive renovations to the building and fortified much like a bunker.

Look at who was in the building. CIA. Secret Service. Mayoral Command and control (which, do we not find it odd that Rudy decided to go to another command site).

I mean, you can debate this all day… but if you really are not afraid to confront the scientific and factual realities of what happened on 9/11… just look up the vids on here.

All of the 9/11 “truthers” – Architects & Engineers, 9/11 families, Susan Lindauer (former CIA asset), Jim Marrs. But, back to 6 – here you go: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4xq88667
Reply
·
Sean Mezzo
2 days ago

Oh, and we don’t know who gave the order to evacuate Bldg 7 OFFICIALLY because NIST never investigated it.?
Sean Mezzo
2 days ago

It’s really all over. And I would agree regarding 7 specifically in regard to damage vs. FDNY decision to “pull it” and also “bunker”- like build.

If you go online, Larry Silverstein (who held the lease on the twin towers as well, had recently done extensive renovations to the building and fortified much like a bunker.

Look at who was in the building. CIA. Secret Service. Mayoral Command and control (which, do we not find it odd that Rudy decided to go to another command site).

I mean, you can debate this all day… but if you really are not afraid to confront the scientific and factual realities of what happened on 9/11…

just look up the vids on here. All of the 9/11 “truthers” – Architects & Engineers, 9/11 families, Susan Lindauer (former CIA asset), Jim Marrs. But, back to 6 – here you go: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4xq88667 ?
Reply
·
Sean Mezzo
2 days ago

Oh, and we don’t know who gave the order to evacuate Bldg 7 OFFICIALLY because NIST never investigated it.?
Reply
·
Kenny Upton
6 months ago

If this IS the same Bennete, he was accused of stealing cars from the 9/11 scene, but got off with 6 month probation according to this report: http://nypost.com/2005/10/27/judge-rips-911-case/
Kenny Upton
6 months ago

Is this by chance the same Bennette? http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/04/16/1082055656027.html
3
9/11 Nuclear Demolition
6 months ago (edited)

The siren means that the demolition feature has been activated. 2 short beeps means Tower 2 has been demolished.

Next set of sirens will be same, but will be 1 short beep for Tower 1 (which comes down 30 mins later). Demolition feature contains a 30 minute safety window from delivery of the nuclear munition from WTC-7 to each tower.

Furthermore, they had to pull Tower 2 first despite the fact it was ‘hit’ second. Reason is because blowing Tower 1 first would block access from WTC-7 to Tower 2.

There are seals which must be hermetically sealed along the mini-railyway and 4 sets of blast doors all the way from each ground zero to the control room in WTC-7.

Bennette states he is “OST” which stands for Office of Secure Transportation. Google them.

They specialize in the delivery and safe maintenance of nuclear munitions.

They threw Bennette under the bus and threatened him w/ prison time after this for supposedly stealing from the WTC. My 2 cents is they did this to keep him in check.

Also, towards the end of the day ~30 minutes before 5:22 PM EST, the alarm came on again and the beeps were “7” short beeps…any guess what the “7” stood for? :)?

Also, starting @ 0:19 seconds into this video

Inside 7 World Trade Center Moments Before Collapse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLqGRv7CQlc

you can hear outside of WTC-7 the nuclear radiation whistle alarm in full alert. Listen careful. It’s an annoying high-pitched oscillating sound.

Hope that helps!

Ground Zero: “The place of a nuclear explosion.”
~Websters dictionary, 1999.?
·
7
Denierbud11
4 months ago

Its amazing the delusional state some people find themselves in — as if a siren would signal nuclear demolition — danger will robinsion!!?
Reply
·
thebluetarp
1 month ago (edited)

+Denierbud11 you are either a total moron, or a paid shill. witch is it? your family must be very proud…i hope you do not have children?
Reply
·
Denierbud11
1 month ago

I love when truthers resort to insults, its the first sign they lost the argument?
Reply
·
ManAgainstCrime
2 days ago

Just wondering, how did you verify all that?

How would the average person differentiate between an evacuation siren and this “demolition feature activation” siren?

Are there any previous examples of the latter? And if true, why would a nuclear demo be advertised in this way? Very odd.

Just curious and asking.

I checked Office of Secure Transportation (OST) and you’re right. But could OST stand for something else instead? I guess we’d need to look at what other ‘OST’s employ the secret service.

Intriguing.?
Reply
·
Denierbud11
2 days ago

truthers just make it up as they go?
Reply
·
Denierbud11
7 months ago

Oh look, he’s wearing a construction hat — he must be a nuclear demolition man — he could not be A) just wearing whatever protective gear happened to be available, B) a low level security specialist for a government agency that was located in the building, using a constrution hat for safety?
Reply
·
2
Anton Vdk
4 months ago

hmmm, do you even know what OST means? I googled it for u! : The U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration’s Office of Secure Transportation (OST) provides safe and secure transportation of nuclear weapons and components and special nuclear materials, and conducts other missions supporting the national security of the United States of America. Peace?
Reply
·
2
Denierbud11
4 months ago

+Anton Vdk OST is a rank in the US secret service — feel free to give them a call to confirm it — that is how I found out what it was — there are times a google search is not enough to answer an a question intelligently – you can find the secret service phone number with a google search?
Reply
·
1
Ford Prefect
7 months ago (edited)

Nuclear demolition is the biggest piece of disinformation ever foisted on the truth movement; and unfortunately, a lot off people are so desperate for answers.

They’ll now believe anyone who can dazzle them with an in-depth, and so called fact filled presentation!
(No disrespect intended to Dimitri; He seems quite a pleasant, informed, and articulate man)

And yes, before anybody slams me, I have seen The Third Truth presentation.

And after reviewing and comparing it’s content with what is known so far; I have to say it’s so full of holes, it would put Swiss cheese to shame!..

But hay, that’s just my opinion; and as wise old seaman one said…”Opinions are like Arseholes…Everyone’s got one!”?
Reply
·
2
FlyingArchitect
4 months ago

What are some of the basic holes you find? Anyone in the so called “truth movement” knows that Alex Jones and Loose Change is disinformation because Alex is a disinformation agent. DVD and TV- documentaries are always disinformation because they all have to be approved before being released.

Now Dimitri could also be a shill because he is selling a book clearly to make some money.

But the Twin towers were turned into dust, which basic demolition would not accomplish.

So they had to use some sort of technology that would be able to turn everything into microscopic dust because almost nothing was found: no desks, no computers, nothing, just some steel columns from above.

The level of disinformation is huge even in the “truth movement” because the power elite will hire different experts and their own people to investigate the site and announce falls information to the truthers in order to coverup the truth whatever the real truth happens to be.?
Reply
·
Ford Prefect
4 months ago (edited)

+MrsFlyingArchitect Some basic Hole’s; there are so many, where would you like to begin.

Well, a good portion of the structural steel wasn’t actually pulverised; it was thrown laterally outwards at around 70 mph, over a distance of 600 ft, embedding itself in near by structures.

Also, some of the perimeter steel just above street level remained standing upright, when Dimitri claims that all the structure below the points of impact was atomised into dust by a Nuclear shock-wave!

Not to mention that a small group of people survived the collapse of the North Tower in stairwell B not far from ground level, and were not atomised by the same shock-wave, despite being closer to the point of detonation than everything above them that supposedly was.

What was pulverised into fine dust was approximately 150,000 cubic yards of reinforced concrete, plasterboard, asbestos fireproofing, office furnishings and very sadly, people.

But this I doubt was achieved by a supposedly untried and pre-installed Nuclear demolition device.

The nature of Military grade high explosives are not widely known outside of the the armed services, the Defence, Mining and Demolition industries.

Military variants have many times the explosive yield of any munitions used commercially, and when deployed in the right amounts and configurations, can demolish hardened structures at high efficiency.

If you look at the nature of known underground Nuclear detonations (The Sedan Nuclear test is a good source), you’ll see how untenable the whole Nuclear Demolition scheme is!

A majority of the structural steel was recovered and quickly shipped off to China to be recycled, which in itself was a crime, and smacks of a cover-up.

But not that of a panicked administration who, in the best interest of it’s citizen’s, hit the big threatening Red buttons, and detonated the shallowly buried Nuclear charges!

And that’s the ploy here…To exonerate the real perpetrators, to make them seem to us like they were duped, and only acting in the public interest.

Mr Khalezov himself, I don’t think is part of this; but I do think he’s been duped into pushing this. Just look at his supposed source!?
Reply
·
1
FlyingArchitect
4 months ago

So what is your conclusion on how the buildings came down? Because some sort of demolition was used because otherwise the Twin Towers, WTC 7 would not have fallen.

I have seen a lot of buildings on fire but they have never fallen without controlled demolition. ?
Reply
·
1
Ford Prefect
4 months ago

+MrsFlyingArchitect Oh they were definitely brought down by intentional demolition, no doubt about it; but not by 150 kt nuclear munitions buried 77 meters below their lowest foundations.

The Sedan nuclear test used only a 104 kt nuclear munition, and was buried at a depth of 194 meters.

That’s a lesser charge buried at greater depth, but lifting the surrounding earth some 90 meters and generating a crater 100 meters deep and 330 meters in diameter, with seismic shock of 4.75.

None of these effects were witnessed once on that fateful day, let alone on three separate occasions.

Had they been; then that particular part of lower Manhattan which is built on derelict Dockland, that was itself reclaimed from the river, would of disappeared into said river.

No, I believe that the Towers were hard wired a few months in advance by a small team of specialist, under the guise of a Lift and internet cable renewal program; of which was ongoing in the lead up to, and completed just before.

911 was an operation that I would suspect was many years in the planning, which included in its matrix the construction of WTC 7 for the housing of its base of operations; the Mayors OEM.

The Towers themselves being wired with experimental high grade military explosive configured in such a way, that the resulting explosion will look like catastrophic failure on a grand scale; and not like the characteristic implosion associated with a controlled demolition.

Building 7 was conventionally weakened and wired, as its demise was probably supposed to be hidden by the collapse of the north tower, which for reasons known only those involved, seems to have gone awry, and required fires being started within to cover its eventual pulling later that day.?
Reply
·
1
WaLkWiThMeMyFaMiLy
2 months ago

+Ford Perfect
YES! YES! YES! 100% CORRECT MY BROTHER!
The only reason why wtc7 fell so obviously controlled!

Because on wtc1 wtc2 had to make it look like it collapsed where the DARK GREY MILITARY PLANES HIT!

That is why wt7 was way to obvious! And yes I do believe another drone plane was meant to hit wtc7 it is that simple! + Ford Perfect whats you’re take on where they flew the passengers or were they apart of it? or did they get executed (bless them!) but where?

I know one of the planes landed back at the airport and passengers removed. Civilians were told to evacuate the airport because a highjacked plane was going to land, am I correct or on the right track with you bro?

Much love brother looking FORD to you’re reply, see what I done there ford ;) we can still joke around cause we are the true investigators at work! LOVE EVERYONE HATE NOTHING! +?
Reply
·
Ford Prefect
1 month ago (edited)

Its impossible to say with any real certainty what may have happened to the passengers and crew aboard any of those fateful flights that day; but I think its safe to say that their day didn’t end well!

I have heard a few reports of a mystery flight landing at Cleveland’s Hopkins airport, along with another plane identified as Delta 1989, and it’s passengers being evacuated to the little used ‘John Glen’ NASA facility, while 89’s passengers were sent directly to Hopkins FAA headquarters.

Also; there is the case of New York Giant’s player ‘Clayton White’ who testified to witnessing the delayed flight 93 being boarded by a second group of passengers directly from the Tarmac, after the already late running Jet had cleared the Jet bridge!

As for a third Plane scenario involving Building 7, there could be some credence to this.

Based upon the testimonies of EMT Richard Zarillo and Captain Abdo Nahmod who both arrived at Building 7 around 09:35 am, making their way to the  Mayors Office of Emergency Management bunker located 23rd floor.

Finding it strangely deserted they proceeded to activate the Bunker, but where then startled by unknown person who emerged from one of the side rooms and only identified himself as a senior OEM manager, who then advised them to abandon the control center and evacuate the Building as third plane was inbound.

But seeing as though no third plane ever materialized, I think this was just a ploy to get Zarillo and Nahmod out of the OEM (which I believe was being used as their base of operations) without raising suspicion!?
Reply
·
1
WaLkWiThMeMyFaMiLy
1 month ago

Thanks heaps my good brother! Keep up the good work we will get there ;)?
Reply
·
Ford Prefect
1 month ago

You too Friend; one day the truth will be known.?
Reply
·
1
AdamIowa89
7 months ago

Looks like he is Secret Service to me.
GanjaClaus
7 months ago

Most people don’t notice 2.49 – 3.00: The govt. sends in a bionic man – he is rushing at full speed as seen before 2.49

The guy then sees the cam and slows down as passing by and then looks back before engaging bionics again.. :D
Denierbud11
8 months ago
in reply to UniBrowStudioVision

your incredulity is meaningless, as are your arguments
UniBrowStudioVision
8 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

debunkers are all over the 9-11 set up huh? Guys with box cutters? lol
Denierbud11
9 months ago
in reply to UniBrowStudioVision

Its essential to the premise — Dimitri starts from the assumption that demolition plans be in place — yet he has no evidence his assumption is true when asked the response is .. crickets seek the real truth
UniBrowStudioVision
9 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

side tracking. Look up Extortion 17. Leave me alone shill.
Denierbud11
9 months ago
in reply to UniBrowStudioVision

what do you mean screen shot from the FBI? and please explain why asking questions in not appropriate?

if you want to find the truth, ask the hard questions start with a simple one — Dimitri claims there is a building code can you cite the code?
UniBrowStudioVision
9 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

TROLL
UniBrowStudioVision
9 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

err your a misinformed IDIOT (as in “person lacking professional skill”). I have the link and screen shot from FBI press release on the FBI . Your ill informed. So sorry DISINFO agent go back to the bridge and troll there. I HAVE THE SCREEN SHOT from the FBI web site.
Denierbud11
9 months ago
in reply to UniBrowStudioVision

“Look up 2 (THAT’S TWO) lead investigators for FBI for Boston Bombing fell out of helicopter “

What a distortion of the truth two memebers of the FBI hostage rescue unit died in a training mishap they were NOT lead investigators — why do you lie?
bourasson
9 months ago

google this Secret Service man accused of stealing cars lost on September 11
Denierbud11
9 months ago
in reply to Mike Philbin

or he hasn’t been outside since the collapse … gee, wonder why, perhaps the danger involved and his duty to stay on station
UniBrowStudioVision
9 months ago
in reply to LegendKnight93

if your an agent, then you are left in the dark without upper clearance, wait almost all those cleared agents or people in the know were taken out by the same gov’t ops.

Look up 2 (THAT’S TWO) lead investigators for FBI for Boston Bombing fell out of helicopter – then two days later senior director steps down from FBI also a lead on Boston Bombing.

My biggest thing is when the government lies 10 times why is the 11th a conspiracy. Do more research. Follow the money trail.
UniBrowStudioVision
9 months ago

Dimitri why not use vimeo… its ez and free. Upload everything there and archive it for EVERYONE!!! provide links in description and make a video short and sweet to announce where to find it :) -John Massaria
WTCNUKED
9 months ago
in reply to Mike Philbin

Didnt think about it that way. Interesting. He probably was inside WTC7 before any of it started, knowing what he had to do that day.
Mike Philbin
9 months ago

“I haven’t seen out side, yet,” kinda implies he’s ‘been inside’ the whole time.
Piotr Zalewski
9 months ago

1
Denierbud11
9 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

what hard work did you do? I see nothing original, you are just a blind follower of Dimitri and the rest
WTCNUKED
9 months ago
in reply to LegendKnight93

You are suggesting 9/11 was not an inside job. If you are not, then youre suggesting planes were used. I watched your real life video “Why it’s deadly for society…”

I clicked it away the moment you used the word “debunked” and winked your eyes twice really fast, you KNOW youre just wasting time trying to destroy other peoples hard work to wake people up.
LegendKnight93
9 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

Is something wrong with the link or its spelling” My screen says “page cannot be displayed”.
Sidionian
9 months ago
in reply to LegendKnight93

You’re a certified, public idiot. Please do not address me again. In any case, you’ll be ignored. Thank you, and enjoy the rest of your…interesting… life.
LegendKnight93
9 months ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

Which order should I watch your videos in?
LegendKnight93
9 months ago
in reply to Sidionian

18 doesn’t prove anything. Just anecdotal evidence. IF 9/11 was an inside job thousands of people including the air traffic controllers, airline managers, demolition crew, witnesses, etc. would have to be cooperating. 19 same. 20 Prove they worship Satan.

If you can. Prove sing sources that aren’t conspiracy sites how many are members.
LegendKnight93
9 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

Logically thinking considering how much they weighed all that dust makes sense.
LegendKnight93
9 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

You think it would NOT be turned into dust? Do you think these buildings weighed only a couple thousand pounds!?
LegendKnight93
9 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

I have answered them.
LegendKnight93
9 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

I do it not because I’m an agent, but because I want to stop conspiracy theorists from starting a war! My feed is full of debunkings of many conspiracy claims, & scroll down on my feed to my replies to hitech98’s claims of CGI fakery on 9/11. Molten material in the wreckage is not from nukes, look up debunking911 & click molten steel explained.
LegendKnight93
9 months ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

False parallel fallacy. Comparing apples & oranges.
Denierbud11
9 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

its not another OST you moron! OST is a job classification in the Secret Service the man is wearing a secret service vest he says he is with the secret service and gives his job classification the secret service had an office in the building why the hell would the office of secure transportation be there?

Dimitri claims the buildings were built with bombs in the basement == what is there to transport OST does not detonate nuclear bombs
WTCNUKED
9 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

So youre saying its a coincidence that there is another OST which safely handles nuclear materials? The Office of Secure Transportation (OST) is managed by the National Nuclear Security Administration within the U. S. Department of Energy. OST is responsible for the safe and secure transport in the contiguous United States of government-owned special nuclear materials.
Denierbud11
9 months ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

at one time, you claimed the subject of this video was with the office of secure transportation, simply because he gave his title as OST. YOU never bothered to do any more than a google search.

I called the secret service, and in two minutes, identified OST as a rank in the secret service so here again, one of your conclusions has been shown to be false — and all you did was move the goal posts (feel free to google that saying)
Dimitri Khalezov
10 months ago

Hi to everyone. There is an additional download – very interesting. Please, get it from my hosting named 911-truthDOTcom – go that web site and find there a zip archive named “pre-911_dictionaries_ground_zero4.zip”.

Feel free to share both – this zip-archive and a direct download link for it (I can’t post the actual link here due to YouTube limitations). This is a very important info. You will certainly love it.
Dimitri Khalezov
10 months ago

Hi to everyone! My full book on 9/11thology is OUT NOW! Get it as soon as possible, before it is too late! Links are on this YouTube page:

9/11thology – full version of my book is ready! Download it now!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fk8hGIvuOKI
Denierbud11
10 months ago
in reply to JP Hiller

what is JP Hiller?
Denierbud11
10 months ago
in reply to Brock1812

the secret service had an office in the building
JP Hiller
10 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

Why would you choose a handle like Denierbud? What happened to all your holocaust denial videos denier – bud?
Brock1812
10 months ago

why is a secret service agent in a building that only has a fire in it?
Denierbud11
10 months ago
in reply to Gez501

bullshit — there is no nuke the size of a baseball — anymore lies?
Colours Capello
10 months ago

Actually, I keep returning to this video because of the alarm in the background. I find myself haunted by it. That may seem like a weird thing to say but I think of it often. It’s just so… creepy?
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

Its wonderful that you set aside this special time to humiliate yourself in public — do you do shows?
WTCNUKED
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

My version is the exact reality, hence why I told you to picture the towers, with logically thinking you would ask yourself where did they go?

Do you think it would be possible to rebuild the 3 towers with the debris laying around ground zero, its impossible because you pictured in your mind how huge they were.
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

The point is, your version of reality is not reality for the world. The towers collapsed, they did not turn to dust – and so turning to dust is NOT the ONLY possibilty.

Please provide some evidence and corresponding calculations regarding your 1% estimate — love to see how math works in your universe …
WTCNUKED
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

The point is, your pulling the emotion card, which is a distraction technique. Picture the Twin Towers and Building 7.

Where are those 3 HUGE towers? Them being turned to dust are the only possibilities.

The rubble you see laying around Ground Zero is not even 1% of the Towers.

You will not brainwash a single person, only make yourself more suspicious.
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to Blevy06

” I personally know none of it existed” How do you know this? what knowledge do you posses that the rest of the world does not?

I bet you can’t cite the building code — can you?? I bet you can’t prove no office equipment existed? do you post on Let’s Roll – who are you there?
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

one of my friends was there fuckhead — as were 50,000 fellow Americans, nearly 3,000 died what do you think, that two 110 story office buildings open to the public were secretly evacuated and emptied of office supplies?
Blevy06
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

Show me proof that any of the furniture, computers, toilets, phones was in the debris.

You insult me you freaking idiot, I personally know none of it existed.

Everything was pulverized into dust. Your a scumbag troll and I doubt you ever been to NY.

People ignore this maggot read his comments not one of them is backed by any facts.

I bet this maggot doesn’t show a single piece of evidence or any facts to back up his claim.
WTCNUKED
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

You failed to answer his questions, nor did you share your opinion. Your whole reply is a distraction, it has nothing to do with what he asked you.

You even pulled the emotion card where “one of your friends barely made it out alive”. Denierbud11, proving himself to be a shill, once again.
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to Sidionian

prove you are not a brain in a jar
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to Blevy06

how could an intelligent person think there were no furniture or office supplies in the debri — what kind of statement is that?

50,000 people worked in those towers, the tallest buildings in the most populated city in the US — one of my friends barely made it out alive — I do not think you have common sense, if you did, you would not make such a stupid statement
Blevy06
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

Then what did bring them down?

A person as intelligent as you truly don’t believe that fires from the planes crashing into them caused there collapse.

What about the absence of any furniture, office supplies, there was nothing from inside those buildings but dust.

I’m no expert but I do have common sense. What’s your opinion? If you don’t mind telling me.
Denierbud11
11 months ago

So, no citation to a building code, though that is essential for any discussion does it embarrass you ??
Sidionian
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

18) Explain why Bush and Cheney refused to be interviewed separately and not under oath 19) Explain where the 2 trillion dollars disappeared to 20)

Explain what Bush got up to with the Skull and Bones society, and how/why many senior political/military leaders are members of secret societies and how they connect globally…

Just old men bored and playing games together? Isn’t Bush a Christian?

What’s he doing in an occult society? 21)

Explain why I am wasting my time on your dumb ass…
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to Sidionian

no points for spam — cite the building code and then I will be happy to answer any question you have
Sidionian
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

13) Explain why Pentagon footage shows no airplane and virtually no explosion…

14) Explain why most of the Pentagon footage was confiscated, and explain why it is dated 9/12

15) Explain Rumsfeld’s Freudian slip of flight 93 being “shot down.”

16) Explain why WTCs collapsed, even though not even one hundred 767’s could bring them down if flying into them one after another…

17) Explain why WTC wreckage was promptly cleared, instead of conducting a proper forensic examination…
Sidionian
11 months ago
in reply to Sidionian

8) Explain the mathematically (even for a computer) impossible maneuvers of the supposed plane hitting the Pentagon

9) Explain how aluminum can penetrate reinforced steel

10) Explain why Dimitri decided to concoct a fanciful story, despite having nothing to gain from this (not even money)

11) Explain why US independent newspapers reported hijackers alive and well

12) Explain how this coincides with the recent scandal involving MOSSAD agents using fake passports of Australian citizens
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to Sidionian

He specifically makes the claim that it was required in the building codes that there be a demolition plan in place before construction cite the code
Sidionian
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

6) Explain Dimitri’s testimonial as to his meeting with Mike Harari (if you claim this a lie, you’ll prove what level you’re at)

7) Explain Why these individuals, who have nothing to profit or gain (not even fame and fortune), would risk their lives to discuss these issues.

Entertainment? Notoriety? Boredom?

Explain why so many individuals who had much to gain from a Middle Eastern invasion, also happened to be in charge of the operations involved…Hmmm Start explaining, you boring cunt.
Sidionian
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

For example,

1) Explain why 9/11 was labeled Ground Zero, despite all dictionaries prior to 9/11 clearly defining it as a site where a nuclear demolition/detonation has taken place.

(Don’t deny this, I’ve checked it for myself).

2) Explain the bone cancer and leukemia victims of the radiation

3) Explain the circular perimeter of destruction so mathematically precise as per thermonuclear demolition

4) Explain Aaron Russo’s detailed interview

5) Explain mysterious deaths whistleblowers
Sidionian
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

Error again retard. He never claimed that this was officially provided on the codes.

Why would he be so stupid as to claim something that’s easily verifiable?

He could simply have stated that there was a secret requirement overriding building codes, only viewable by individuals with top secret clearance.

Nothing controversial there.

Business as usual in America, with its Black budgets and Black projects.

Stop dancing around the subject, and explain the relevant issues Dimitri discusses…
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to Sidionian

HIS experience is not the issue, his credibility is so again, cite the building code that is the premise of the theory
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to Sidionian

Dimitri is your god isn’t he? you just accept what he says, and require that others follow him?!

How can you be so fucking blind BUILDING CODES are public domain documents, every builder in the US has access to them — is EVERY architect in the country keeping quiet about this building code?? everyone, for the last 60 years? good lord – talk about following a faith blindly seek professional help
Sidionian
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

Your tactic is so pathetic, and it goes something like this: “Let’s ignore eye witness testimony of Khalezov’s experience as a nuclear intelligence officer.

He must be lying/insane/ruthless” “Let’s ignore Aaron Russo’s detailed interview.

He must be lying/insane/ruthless.” “Let’s ignore all the mathematical and physical evidence that strongly support Dimitry’s explanation of the underground thermonuclear demolitions. NO. I’ll just ask for proof of the building codes. HAHAHAHA.” Dunce.
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to Sidionian

No, Dimitri claimed that there is a building code that REQUIRES ALL buildings built in the US

– be built with a demolition plan in place — only in the LARGEST buildings are a nuclear weapon needed In fact, there is no such requirement — at all — in any way

– its a total fabrication

– for proof, looke at historical building codes

– the builders build to fit the building codes

– there is not ONE building code that has this requirement

– it could NOT be secret

– everyone MUST follow it
Sidionian
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

Dimitri’s function is to be a witness for the prosecution against the culprits in US government for the atrocities of 9/11.

The fact that such a class action suite has not yet been undertaken against US government, proves how corrupt it is.

Most witnesses trying to go public, have been murdered (oh, wait, they just committed suicide and had heart attacks or accidents…how convenient. Accidents do happen, I guess).
Sidionian
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

*bear = bare
Sidionian
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

bear = bare
Sidionian
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

You sound like a baby. Remember the Jodi Arias case?

Prove that she killed her ex bf. DNA evidence and photos aren’t proof enough.

Prove that she actually took the knife with her bear hands and thrust it into his flesh.

See, what you don’t understand is, there’s sufficient evidence in his testimony to prove he is credible.

Dimitri made clear that this was a secret agreement with Soviet intelligence, which wasn’t made public.

Oh, government secrets don’t exist? OMG!!! Tin foil hat!! Quack.
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

who compiles the official list, you or the voices in your head?
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to Sidionian

Nope – the problem is, YOU must prove your ridiculus theory first – show that there was a requirement that buildings be built with a demolition plan in place second

- prove there was a nuclear demolition devise third

- prove there was a nuclear demolition Let’s start with number one

– PROVE there was a requirement that demolition plans be in place before a building is constructed good luck

– for any honest reader

– just watch the reaction when proof or evidence is demanded !!
WTCNUKED
11 months ago

SHILLS ARE HERE PEOPLE, BECAREFUL READING COMMENTS HERE IS THE OFFICIAL 9/11 DISINFO LIST:

This video has been removed as a violation of YouTube’s policy against spam, scams, and commercially deceptive content.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULScpPG3cVQ
Sidionian
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

Yawn.

When all else fails, just employ the old DENIER tactic (hence your name): “

Nope, that didn’t happen.

Nope, not true. Nope, impossible.

Nope, that’s a twoofer lie.

Nope, not in a million years!

Nope, Bush admin don’t make it up as they go — you twoofers do!

Nope, Cheney had nothing to gain from Iraq invasion.

Nope, heroin is not controlled by CIA in Afghanistan.

Nope, Dimitri is not a credible witness and he did not meet Mike Harari.

Nope, Dimitri never worked in Russia….” YAAAAWWWWWWN.
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to Sidionian

the buildings were NOT brought down by demolition, controlled, nuclear or otherwise it was called ground zero because of the devastation, there were NO OST personnel in WTC 7 – this video is proof of that nice lies, why do you lie?
Sidionian
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

Dunce, cut the bullshit, and invite Dimitri Khalezov

The buildings were brought down by controlled thermonuclear demolitions, and the structural damage and hundreds of cases of leukemia/bone cancers prove it.

Let’s not forget why it was originally called “Ground Zero” either. I’m sure you have an excuse for that also.

Let’s not forget the CBS footage of OST personnel in the WTC 7 building, further solidifying Dimitri’s case.

You won’t dare debate him in public. Why?
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to Neo Morpheus

I think you just made the list — wtcpuked will think you are me, or I am you, or you are Fernando, or , well, who knows what WTCpuked thinks, or that he hears voices
Neo Morpheus
11 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

If this guy is “on the list”, I also want to be “on the list”. Where do I sign up? I have more than 300 certified truthers debunked and publicly exposed as liars and humiliated. Is it enough, or should I continue?
Neo Morpheus
11 months ago
in reply to carlito scasiotta

They died on the planes. In fact, they were the first to die, since they were in the cockpits, and we do not know for sure if the stabbed passengers/pilots were completely dead at the time of the plane crashes.
Denierbud11
11 months ago

as our friend puke tries to divert, let’s return to the evidence — this man was a Secret Service employee, OST is his rank/job, and the Secret Service had an office in the building, so his presence is not unexpected another truther myth destroyed.
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

man, you need serious help, do you hear voices?
WTCNUKED
11 months ago
in reply to Nathan Anderson

Denierbud11, I know its you.

The reason why you just commented 4 times in a row is because you dont want people to see the comments I made below.

Congratulations, you just made your team more and more suspicious, expect punishment from your bosses!
Nathan Anderson
11 months ago

Anonymous pretty good group. Federal government hiring too.
Nathan Anderson
11 months ago

Join group join collectives buy ammo buy guns never stop learning always syndicate and grow some balls
Nathan Anderson
11 months ago

And who ever used the word delusion, know this…!!everything you think you know everywhere all around you since your birth is that word in its purest definition.

Fucked up people rule the world, so quit your bitchin and do something about it
Nathan Anderson
11 months ago

There’s much more going on than old nrwd 911 fact bitching. Of course it was an inside job. Can act more dots guys!! It’s not hard
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

I person with no identity is by definition a shill
WTCNUKED
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

Who I am does not matter, what matters is what I say, the question is why would you want to know about my personal stuff and why do you dislike my content?

Everybody knows why. Your a known shill. If anyone has NOTHING personal on his page it is YOU.

All your videos were poorly created to make it seem like you are a legit person, same goes for Fernando Negro, your other account where you like to talk to from your other account, to distract us.

Your attempt to backfire at me has failed, agent.
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

Or I simply like to laugh at someone as stupid as you — since you have NOTHING personal on your home page, I submit you are the agent here
WTCNUKED
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

There are 2 possible reasons why someone would keep on returning to this video on a daily basis:

- You are assigned to continuesly distract and discredit here. or

- You are aware of existence of the above. Y

ou, are located on the official 9/11 disinfo list.
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

how delusional do you have to be to be a truther these days? because anthony and nuked are two total wackamol jobs
carlito scasiotta
11 months ago

Everybody knows 911 was an inside job. The problem is how to bring the people responsible for this murder to justice.
WTCNUKED
11 months ago
in reply to x19guy

Both ctcole77 and denierbud11 are located on the 9/11 disinfo list.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULScpPG3cVQ

They openly admit they are shills.
x19guy
11 months ago

I understood everything about ctcole77’s mental capacity
ctcole77
11 months ago
in reply to x19guy

Yeah, this video is about 911 twoofer lies
x19guy
11 months ago
in reply to ctcole77

who said anything about thermite here? Do you even know what this video is related to?
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

you are a known idiot and wacked nut job who hears voices
WTCNUKED
11 months ago
in reply to Denierbud11

You are a known shill, so anything you say should just be ignored.
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to Marvel Avenger

The English language evolves, definitions change — prior to 1945, ground zero was not a term in common usage
Marvel Avenger
11 months ago

Ground zero is the point where a nuclear Bomb explodes, not point of pancake collapse lol
Denierbud11
11 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

is English a second languate?
WTCNUKED
11 months ago
in reply to ctcole77

Thanks for proving my point, just now by quoting what I said.
ctcole77
11 months ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific Consultants WTC Dust Study 2/28/2012

“The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coating with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments.”

“There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nanothermite.” 911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
TimReed22222
1 year ago

? What does this video have to do with the nuclear demolition theory? What reason do you have to believe that the siren audible in this video is anything other than a fire alarm?

How big of a nutball do you have to be to be suspicious of an ordinary hard hat?
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to Michael Farenborn

go back to your meds
Michael Farenborn
1 year ago
in reply to LudicFallacies

Go back to sleep, sheep.
LudicFallacies
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

WOW What’s this WTC Nuked thing? You don’t seriously believe that do you? LOL
LudicFallacies
1 year ago

Nuclear demolition man? I’m amazed how many crazies have YouTube channels with videos like this. YouTube=Kook Central
Hawaiiguy Kailua
1 year ago

Very Surreal
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

nope, I am just me, no one else, it must be those voices you hear
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

The primary objective of a disinfo agent is to distract. You are using multiple youtube accounts including Fernando Negro.
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

I thought I was a disinfo agent, now I am just a distracting agent– ah, I get it, do the voices in your head distract you?
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

You are TRYING to distract us, thats all.
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

It took me three months to stop laughing. I challenge you to show and prove anything I have posted is incorrect.
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

It took you 3 months to reply to my comment. You get paid spreading disinformation around Dimitri’s videos.

You and Fernando Negro are the same person just different accounts trying to distract us from the facts we know. Do not comment here again.
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

try calling and asking, they should have a job description available — or try google

Which positions require completion of a polygraph examination?

Currently, the following positions require successful completion of a polygraph examination prior to appointment: Special Agent, Uniformed Division Officer, Physical Security Specialist, Special Officer, Operations Support Technician, ,,,,,
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to taxirock90

google image secret service — you will see many agents with vests with the name
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

a simple phone call to ANY secret service office will clear it up for you, not hard to do, and is certainly a valid search that should be performed before leaping to an incredible conclusion.
scooter2ish
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

would you mind being asked a few questions?
grabkreuzen
1 year ago

a video of a 100 kilotons underground nuke test https://www.youtube.com//watch?v=l5jfaXSFfGQ
taxirock90
1 year ago

First time I’ve seen a secret service person with a jacket that says so. Not very secret anymore.
facebookprogrammer
1 year ago

If he says ‘the top of the building just fell over on us’ then he is referring to the North Tower (which fell second, despite being ‘hit’ first). That means that the South Tower had already fallen earlier that morning AND the North Tower had fallen as well. Confirmations on this?
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

From what I can see in a bad picture available in a ny1[dot]com article, this really does seem to be the same SS agent, named Bennette, known to have been at WTC 7 during the attacks and that was later caught stealing cars in the aftermath.

And, in a 2004 AP article, he’s said to be an “office support technician” – hence, the “OST” title he gave to the cameraman. (Mystery solved – at least, to me.)

The helmet is not enough to make me suspect otherwise. I’m done making any more comments in here.
Smokie1960
1 year ago

Look at all that damage!! Is it any wonder this 47 story building crumbled into dust 8 hours later!

What a joke.

Anyone that still believes the Official 9-11 fairy tale needs their head examined.
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

Still waiting for someone to tell me what exactly an office support techinician does for his job?

I sure know what one does from Office secure transportation.
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

Sounds like in the end they made up that whole story to cover up him talking about OST.
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

(Assuming it’s the same Bennette that was caught stealing cars…) I’ve found the exact title that corresponds to the “OST” initials, in this case: “

Bennette admitted to investigators that he had falsified records and given the cars to his family, according to a complaint against him.

He had been a Secret Service office support technician since 1999, the agency said.” — from an AP news story entitled “Secret Service worker charged in car thefts”
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

One other thing I’ve noticed, concerning this individual… If he’s indeed (as everything points to) the same Bennette who was caught stealing cars, notice how his task (from what is seen in this video) seems to be to “guard the entrance” and prevent people from entering WTC 7.

He survived all this. How come he didn’t die at his post, guarding the entrance of WTC 7 when it fell?

Was he one of the persons who got an advanced warning of the demolition and left the building area before it happened?
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

Incredible… It even made me laugh. This government people are too much… There really are several news references on the Internet to a: “William Bennette, 52″; that “received commendations for valor at 7 World Trade Center on 9/11″; and that was caught stealing cars in the aftermath of 9/11; is described as a “Secret Service office technician”; and who’s picture, in one of the news story, looks very much like him.
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to facebookprogrammer

he went to jail
Jennifer D
1 year ago

This guy is William Bennette who used to be with teh secret service. Unfortunately he was convicted of scam shortly after for selling “agency” cars post 911 and giving his wife and mother an agency car.
David Howard
1 year ago

Google “the selective use of polygraphs”
M EF
1 year ago

For me, this is the spookiest, most surreal video from 9/11. What happened to this guy and who exactly was he?
251omega
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

Don’t be such a cry-baby!

There are lots of other people who think the mini-nuke issue is a fraud, designed to waste time and divert the efforts of honest people doing research into 9/11.

It’s absolutely amazing that ANYONE is taken in by this obvious pseudo-science fraud!
facebookprogrammer
1 year ago

This man is wearing the same golf shirt and logo as my previous post:

A Look inside WTC7 102 Minutes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVwWqVLdT38
facebookprogrammer
1 year ago

Trying to get the logo of the man in the golf shirt that runs up the stairs @ 2:49.

Would like to see if it is similar to that of the NNSA (National Nuclear Security Administration). Takers, anyone?

Also, if you study Bennette’s body behavior, he gestures to his VRU gear when asked about stepping outside near ground zero.

This speaks volumes. They probably brought him up on car theft charges to keep his mouth shut.

He knows what will happen to him the minute he enters prison.
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

(continuation) …Anyway, this is all very odd… A very strange occurrence that I never heard of such anywhere else on YouTube. And I think you should, definitely, contact the YouTube people about it.
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

I’ve remembered… There’s the possibility that the “duplicate” account you “have” has a different password(?) and that, therefore, you cannot access it(?)…

If that happens, and you cannot delete the first video upload attempt you made, you can try uploading a different cut on your “real”/main account, and, that way, there should not be any problem – since, all you need for a video to be considered a different one, is for it to have a single frame more or less. (continues)
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

According to Archive.org, the “Operations Support Technician” title at the SS is listed on their official web page since, at least, the 20th of October 2009 – http://web.archive.org/web/20091020193931/http://www.secretservice.gov/faq.shtml#faq38
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

If the YouTube assistance doesn’t do something first (or if you don’t want to wait for it) you’ll surely have to delete the first upload attempt of the video, first, before uploading it again to YouTube.

Since, YouTube doesn’t allow the postage of repeated videos, even on separate accounts.

I’ve saved and can easily repost my comments in a second upload attempt you might want to make.

But, obviously, always be very careful when deleting stuff and always have backups of everything you post online
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

Denierbud11 talks about a different title than I do.

He talks about an “Operation *Specialist* Technician” one, which I have not found.

While the one I found on the official SS page was “Operations *Support* Technician”.

And this last one can be found (now, at least) on Google searches when you add the “secret service” terms. As for Bennette,

I think that the fact that he might have been caught stealing cars continues to fit better into the actions of a SS agent than that of a nuclear OST member
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

“31 Dec 2012″ is the date in which the second account itself was (supposedly) created.

The video is correctly listed as having been uploaded 6 days ago. I have no idea how that might have happened.

You might want to contact YouTube assistance about it. But, if I were you, I would, anyway, try to upload that video again, using the first account, while checking if that was the one being used, so that the video is listed together with the rest and it is more practical for you and your subscribers.
checkThrice
1 year ago

(part 3) Here is something you would like – A quote from the current president of Egypt Mohamed Morsi who just happens to have a Ph.D. in materials science from the University of Southern California “When you come and tell me that the plane hit the tower like a knife in butter, then you are insulting us, How did the plane cut through the steel like this? Something must have happened from the inside. It’s impossible.”

Fun Fact: Aspiring Dictator Morsi Is A 9/11 Truther. But Does That Make Him Good?

http://www.infowars.com/fun-fact-aspiring-dictator-morsi-is-a-911-truther-but-does-that-make-him-good/
checkThrice
1 year ago

(part 2)When you can focus on concrete evidence -(CNN September 11, 2012) ” Federal health authorities Monday added 58 types of cancer to the list of covered illnesses for people who were exposed to toxins at the site of the World Trade Center in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks.”

58 cancers receive 9/11 fund coverage

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/09/10/health/new-york-wtc-cancer

Good to hear from you by the way ???
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

Perhaps, you are right. I can’t be 100% sure that the OST refers to a department, it might be as well a title in the SS.

However, the initial google searchers returned NOTHING in this sense.

And even when Deniebud11 showed up with his version, the search for the full title he suggested returned NO RUSULT in searches (perhaps, later it will, but it only suggests the most resent attempt to activate this notion).

The proof that Bennette knew about demolition is his well-known attempt to steal cars.
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

Yes, you seem to be right – it looks like I have duplicate accounts, though, to be honest with you, I have no clue why it so happened.

I upploaded that video that seems to be on the “second” account of mine through the first account of mine and not on 31 of December 2012, but just a few days ago (in February 2013), though, once upploaded, it has never shown in the main account.

This must be some error on the part of Google, I guess. Do you know how it can be fixed?
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

Dimitri, You seem to have a duplicate channel(?)… (

1) This account through which you called people’s attention to video “KadRQrXiEKY”: has 33 videos; 1006 subscribers; was created in 5 May 2010; username is “DimitriKhalezov”; and Google+ number is 109746035697870787938.

(2) When one clicks on the account through which that video was posted, that account: has 1 video; 2 subscribers; was created in 31 Dec 2012; username is “UCBfQYrhmMrVQ-PlnmsxwGZw”; and Google+ number is 101158466846588860848.
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

Dimitri the evidence presented in this video – do you agree with these simple observations? the gentleman is wearing a secret service uniform, in a building that had a secret service office, he freely gives his name and states his title as a position that existed in the ranks of the secret service — he wears a VRU, which is freely available and often given to individuals in a high rise building ok with everything so far?
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

>>> When he is asked what he is doing here he says: “As a matter of fact I was standing right underneath WTC 6 when the building…. uhh actually the plane hit it the first time.”

What was he doing right underneath WTC6? Closest building to WTC7? Waiting for it to happen obviously, another proof of foreknowledge.

The reason this man is so suspicious throughout the whole video is because he is lying throughout the whole video, and as we know lying leaves traces, acting is a very hard thing to do.
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

>>> because they have an office there, so keep in mind the only thing that indicates he is SS is the poorly made SS saying bodywarmer

I have never ever seen before, neither have I ever seen a SS agent in some other outfit then a SUIT, that is what they’re known for, but of course he is not wearing that because he is not a SS agent, he is just the guy thats on the look out and that is exactly what he does, he follows camera man around and makes sure hes not going anywhere in the building.
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

No, we don’t know if OST is a title in SS, and even if it is then the chance that there is another OST which safely handles nuclear materials is smaller than the chance of a steel building collapsing due to fire.

It is NOT obvious that this guy is just a SS agent at all, when I google SS uniform I dont find the bodywarmer thing he is wearing, not on page 1 and not on page 10.

It seems more like he was just given that quickly, the only people that have an excuse to be there are SS.
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

(continuation) …that he knows about it. (Notice that he even asks back, to the cameraman, what happened to the building, at the 1:36 mark, and also knows little about it.)

He might have just been given the helmet along with the VRU hood, without knowing more than the rest of the people there.

That’s a much more plausible explanation, to me, than the far-fetched hypotheses of him being a member of the DoE’s OST disguised as a SS agent. –

Thanks, Denierbud11, for your phone call and correction.
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

(To me, at least…) The guy is obviously just a Secret Service agent, after all. (As he says he is and as can be seen in his uniform…)

He answers “OST” after the man with the camera asks him something like: “How do you want your title?”(?) (And “OST”, as we now know, is a title that exists in the SS.)

The question of how and where did he get that helmet remains unanswered, though. But, even if that helmet is there because of the demolition, that doesn’t necessary mean… (continues)
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

About the VRU – you are probably right – it could have been worn by anyone, irrespectively of anything “nuclear” or “radioactive”; it is merely an additional evidence, not primary one.

When it comes to the construction helmet – yes, if you are caught with your “casual” construction helmet (that you have in home) near a building that is being demolished, you will be taken for a demolition team’s member for sure.

Do not even doubt tat you will create exactly that impression in such a situation.
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

I’m saying a lot more than just “there is another OST” OST is a rank — do you know what a rank is? its a position within the US Secret Service, the man gives his name and rank! Its like calling him agent, or seargent — he was a NYPD officer

He was later charged with a crime as a Secret Service agent!

OST is his position/rank/job with the secret service and BTW, the office of secure transporation only TRANSPORTS nuclear weapons, they do not USE them — feel free to show otherwise!
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to pt1gard

“Oh they’re probably going to the bus, thank you.” He obviously leaves because the camera was there, that man had business up there you can tell by the way they act when they notice the camera man comes up, he mentions floor 23 where Rudy Giuliani’s Office of Emergency Management was located.

Can anyone hear what they are saying at the beginning, its hard to understand the words they are saying.

Also is that a police badge the guy is holding or something else?
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

You still ignored the fact that there is “another” OST which safely handles nuclear materials.

You completely ignored it, just like you completely ignored my question on howmuch a shill makes an hour.

Saying “there is another OST” is the ONLY thing you can possibly say after you’ve been confronted with the fact that OST safely handles nuclear materials.

Man wears mandatory Office of Secure Transportation gear: – VRU – Construction helm Building gets demolished by nuclear device.
pt1gard
1 year ago

what does the guy say at 1:00? something about “needing to bust?” this looks like some type of smoking gun for sure
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

there is another OST, its with the secret service, its a rank in their service

– look up the phone number for the secret service and call and ask them! and oh my God, he is wearing a construction hardhat!

I have one at home too, does that make me a demolition guy? and oh, VRU

– “Designed for home, security, law enforcement, first response teams, high-rise building occupants and homeland defense” from one of the first google hits

– designed for high-rise building occupants!
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago

Hi to everyone. Two days ago I uploaded a new nice video here

Jim Miklaszewski warned in advance about Pentagon attack 911 NBC 09.38-09.40 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KadRQrXiEKY

but it seems that it was purely indexed – only 13 views in 3 days. I invite everyone to watch it because there a reporters admits he was warned in advance about the Pentagon strike. This is quite an important video evidence, indeed.
Mr. Lowery
1 year ago

Thanks for the explaining of this guy. I had seen this clip before but didn’t know the importance of it!
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

And he is wearing VRU equipment and a construction helmet in a building that will get demolished hours later.

You embarrass yourself by saying it is a coincidence that there is “another” OST which safely handles nuclear materials. 5th time I repeated that to you btw ^ Howmuch do you make an hour as a shill?
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

so once again, we have secret service officer, in a secret service uniform in a building that housed the secret service, when asked his gives his name and his secret service rank and what was your theory again? that he is not with the secret service, but instead is with an agency that has no affiliation with the secret service yeah
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

The only hole right here is the one caused by the nuclear explosion. Nice Denis Ealey quote btw shill.

I go more with this one: “World events do not occur by accident.

They are made to happen, whether it is to do with national issues or commerce; and most of them are staged and managed by those who hold the purse strings.”
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

good lord, learn to stop digging when you are in a hole
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

I even added the Bennette footage to my documentary which was BEFORE Dimitri turned up again, If you dont find this footage disturbing and suspicious then THATS misleading. Consider taking back everything you just said.
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

You really dont wanna do this. Im typing on google right now “secret service operations specialist technician”

Not a single result where those words are named in one sentence together let alone “operations specialist technician”.

How did I mislead Dimitri when it appears that OST safely handles nuclear materials?

Dimitri was the one who noticed the helmet I didnt even pay attention to it.

Your saying informing the public about this highly suspicious acting man is misleading.
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

(continuation) …I don’t know how true is that, or not. But, it sounds to me more feasible than to fake plane images, in real time – specially, after a huge number of people were already staring at the towers, after the first plane impact. (But, again…

With 911Blogger appearing to be a fake site, who knows if the evidences presented there are fake or not?…)
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

Concerning the renovation work on the WTC floors that were hit, I found something better than the documentary I was looking for (that surely goes into more detail than the documentary would/has).

It might not be a good place to go to, in order to know the Truth about the demolition itself, but, at least, it seems that it might(?) be good for other things(?): http://911blogger.com/node/13272 and http://911blogger.com/node/19889 — (continues)
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

Like Dimitri says… The nuclear demolition itself and whatever is the possible identity of this particular man don’t contradict one another.

And we have all to ask also: “Where did he get that helmet?

How and why did that helmet get there? etc…”
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to TheFreedomMinistry

Dimitri makes a very good argument in his presentation, when he says that aluminium planes cannot penetrate steel targets – like is the case of the WTC towers.

But another thing I also remember very well, is of watching another documentary were it is denounced that the floors that were hit by the airplanes were the subject of renovation(?) work.

– But that’s a documentary I surely have in my archive and that I can easily find, and link to in here. (Just give me some time to find it…)
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

(continuation) …– And yes, WTCNUKED, I don’t believe the “no planes in NYC” part of the presentation.

That’s the only thing I don’t agree with Dimitri on. Even if I do believe that NO plane hit the Pentagon, but some sort of missile instead.

– The fact that you are lying about there not being results at the end of the SS tips I left here, and the the fact that, if I understand correctly(?), you were the one who mislead Dimitri about all this, tell *me* what side you might be possibly on.
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

WTCNUKED, I don’t believe that we can be accessing different pages, with the same addresses, just because we are in different countries.

– (Everyone, just go to the SS official web site – secretservice[dot]gov – and click on the “Frequently Asked Employment Questions” link, on the “Employment” section, on the left column.

After that, click on the “Which positions require completion of a polygraph examination?” shortcut and you will see the position “Operations Support Technician”.) (continues)
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to 251omega

(continuation) …But, the fact that you come here telling people that there’s no evidence whatsoever of nuclear explosions is a *lie*, that Dimitri has already pointed out to.

And you have, therefore, already been exposed as someone who is spreading disinformation.
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to 251omega

The fact that other explosives might have *also* been used, is another question.

– And I also believe that to be the case, because of the several “secondary explosions” that were heard and the straight cuts that could be seen on some of the steel beams.

(Perhaps they were used to facilitate and help with the main (nuclear) demolition operation, that destroyed the buildings’ structure itself? I don’t know. I’m not a demolition expert.) — (continues)
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

So you think it is a coincidence that there is another shill named “denierbud”?

What are you talking about?

The only OST that fits him and his equipment is the Office Secure Transportation because of the VRU and construction helmet.

Exactly he was busted for stealing cars, which raises the suspicion even more.

He is obviously on the look out for people that come in the building and that is exactly what he did, on the look out for the real demolition guys in the building.
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

first, that is a different denierbud, my name is in mockery of him second, OST is a rank in the secret service, the interviewer calls him a sergant, and is corrected with his correct rank, one that fits him and his uniform this guy was even busted for stealing cars, he is no demolition guy you try to find a zebra when there is only a horse
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

What are you still doing here? You embarrass yourself by saying it is a coincidence that there is “another” OST which safely handles nuclear materials.

Your name and videos do not make any sense by the way, raises the suspicion of you being a payed shill. I found a video of you being exposed as a shill years ago on another account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyWrHnFF3Co

Get off this video, now.
WTCNUKED
1 year ago

Fernando, any of the OST suggestions you made do not give me results on google.

Simply because they dont exist, and dont make any sense either. Its not hard to admit that this might be the biggest mistake the perpetrators have made.

Btw did you just say to ignore the no plane theory? If so, then I know what side your on.
TheFreedomMinistry
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

Watch Ace Baker’s film titled “9/11 The Great American Psy-Opera” to understand the full ramifications and truth surrounding the fact that NO PLANES hit the Trade Towers, the Pentagon or crashed in Shanksville, PA.

I hope that a man as intelligent as Dmitri seems, would also understand this fact as plain as the nose on your face.

No planes hit the WTC towers on 9/11, at least not real physical ones that fly in the air, only faked composite ones you’ll see from the lying news media on TV! Chris
251omega
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

Cont. ” Besides, the idea of mini-nulkes doesn’t match the video record ! ” Watching the videos of the Twin Towers’ collapses, we see explosive detonations, at least, on every other floor, for the height of the entire buildings.

If we were watching destruction caused bay mini-nukes, that means that there must have been a minimum of 50 nukes per building!

This doesn’t even pass a minimum laugh-test! OCCAM’S RAZOR needs to be consulted.
251omega
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

There is no evidence of mini-nukes, but there is evidence of nanothermite. Nanothermite was thoroughly documented in a Chemistry Journal, and no one has published a contradiction in any Science Journal.

Some people argue that it was mini-nukes, only, NO thermite.

This is not consistent with facts in evidence, and it certainly dodges the question of why would other explosives be needed, if mini-nukes were used?

Besides, the idea of mini-nulkes doesn’t match the video record !
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

At the first moment I thought that you were honestly pointing to a potential error in the judgement. Now I am inclined to believe that you are merely a shill who muddies the waters using this alleged “error”.

My “research” shows that Benette holds consruction helmet that points CLEARLY that he is from the demolition team.

The fact that the WTC was demolished by nukes was established independently of Bennette & his helmet.

Where do you see me wrong? Question on OST is pending: I am not convinced.
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

he claims that US building codes have a requirement that a demolition plan be in place before a building is constructed this is a lie — there is no such requirement, feel free to prove there is
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

Only a fault in this particular (small) part of his research.

(And I have not yet found, in my already 10 years of research about this kind of subjects, one single researcher who hasn’t made any kind of mistake – including myself.)

Watch his presentation about the nuclear demolition itself, available in video “Lec9giab90I” in here, for example, ignore the (secondary) “no planes in New York city” personal opinion he has, and make your own judgement about the WTC demolition facts he presents.
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

so yes, Dimitri is wrong, this man is just what he claims to be, and shows the fault in Dimitri’s research
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

Found an “OST” position in the SS: “Operations Support Technician” – check http://secretservice.gov/join/faqs.shtml in the “Which positions require completion of a polygraph examination?” section.

(If the copy-paste of my coded link gives you an error, correct the wrongly pasted characters.)
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

I can’t get to these pages now, through this coded links that I left here. But, just google “secret service specialist technician”.
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

Indeed… It never added up very well, to me, that the guy would belong, at the same time, to the SS and the Department of Energy’s OST.

And the way that I rationalized such a thing was that he was lying about the SS part (with the uniform and all), since, the nuclear OST does not belong to the same (state) department as the SS.

— But even though, nothing of what I have said contradicts the fact that the WTC demolition was a *nuclear* one. We just might have misidentified this particular man.
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

(continuation) …I’ve repeatedly tried to find that documentary online, but have not been able to (so far).

But, perhaps someone can find something about a similar episode in English? Of another person that might have been also given a helmet when exiting one of the towers?

(3) I’ve checked one of the SS web pages, and there are some “Specialist” and “Technician” titles there. Take a look at: http://secretservice.gov/join/careers_admin.shtml and also http://secretservice.gov//join/vacancies.shtml
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

(continuation) …on one of the recent 9/11 anniversaries, where a Portuguese woman that was interviewed described she was given a helmet (of the type that is talked about in here) by someone,

because of the falling objects, before exiting one of the towers, and that it was that that prevented her from being harmed by something that fell, when she exited the tower she was in.

(But: How come there were helmets at another one of the lobbies of the WTC? How did they get there? etc.) (continues)
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

For the sake of the argumentation, I have to say several things, though:

(1) The man seems to be referring to his title

- and not his division – when he says “OST”, after the 2:36 mark. (Some native English speaker could perhaps transcribe the question asked by the man with the camera. But, to me, it seems something like: “How do you want it titled?”(?)

(2) I remember very well an interview made on a documentary that aired on a Portuguese TV channel (I think it was on the state TV) (continues)
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to 251omega

(Busted.) That’s exactly the kind of talk I get from people at 911Blogger – putting mini-nukes in the same bag as DEW and even Holocaust denial(!).

(Dimitri’s arguments are solid. And the only way you people can try to discredit him is with lies and empty of content “counterarguments”.)

Everyone, again, read about COINTELPRO and read about the history of political movements.

As one very well-known political leader once said: “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

The man on camera gives his name, gives his secret service rank, is wearing a vest that says secret service and is present at a bulding that has a secret service office — and somehow, you go down the conspiracy trail to say he’s a secret nuke demo guy!
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

What? I dont get it?
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

words will no longer help you
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

Probably a rank that was created after Bennette messed up. By the way, you are basicly saying it is a coincidence there is a OST that handles NUCLEAR materials.
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

Not everything is available on googe — call the local secret service office – ask them what the acroynm OST stands for, again, its a rank in the secret service
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

Thanks for pointing this out – I will surely reconsider some comments. though, to be honest with you, search for “OST” does not return this result, it always returns “Office of Secure Transportation”. Thanks a lot, nonetheless.
Denierbud11
1 year ago

What a laugh — called the secret service, OST is a position within the service, Operation Specialist Technician good lord, you guys are so good at research, tis amazing
facebookprogrammer
1 year ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

Interesting that William Bennette was arrested after 9/11 for stealing cars and not put into prison.

I’m sure this is political warfare so they can railroad and kill him in prison if he ever opens his mouth. WIKI: “The U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration’s Office of Secure Transportation (OST) provides safe & secure transportation of nuclear weapons & components & special nuclear materials, & conducts other missions supporting the national security of the USA.”
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

The English language is a living language, definitions change as life evolves
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

Will you finally identify the building codes you claim existed? you know, the ones that state a building must have a demolition plan in place before construction?
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

When did Mr, Bennette do this? when did he acknowledge he was part of OST, which is NOT related to the secret service, totally different branch of government
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to 251omega

Shills are again here.

There was a radiological survay; do not lie to people. That radiological survey showed up to 300 Roentgens per hour during first hour after each Tower’s collapse.

The evidence of usage nuclear expolosions is the very “ground zero” name, to begin with.

The solid, the purely legal evidence – the legal definition of the spot of a nuclear explosion legally ascribed to the place of the WTC demolition.

The shills have no chance to continue their bullshit. Their time is over.
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to jorge jorge

What makes thinking people to think that he was a nuclear demolition man? I think it is their brains that enable them to think so.

Why he is a “demolition man”? It is because he holds a plastic construction helmet during the event of the demolition, as any other member of a demolition team would.

What makes him “nuclear”? Because he admitted to be from the nuclear department called “OST”. The combination of “nuclear” and “demolition man” could be rendered as the “nuclear demolition man”.
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

It is because Mr. Bennette himself has admitted that he was from OST (not OTS, but “OST”).

The “OST” stands for the “Department of Secure Transportation”. Google for it and you will see what kind of things this organization is actually concerned with.
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to MainstreamSmasherTV

Hi. Please, download this video from my 911-truth[dot]net hosting and keep it, but don’t be in a hurry with the ‘final’ edition of your video, because in only a few days my book will be out and there will be many new things which you might wish to address as well.
251omega
1 year ago

There was a radiological survey performed at “Ground Zero” which found no elevated levels of radiation.

There is no evidence, whatsoever, of the use of nuclear explosives. It’s just another attempt to draw attention away from the well documented and scientifically unchallenged evidence of a special military grade, high-tech explosive, nanothermite, found in all samples of WTC dust.

9/11 dis-info agents try to discredit the 9/11 truthers, by pushing unsupported nonsense like DEW or Mini-Nukes.
MainstreamSmasherTV
1 year ago

Think this is an importend evidence that the wtc has been destroyed by nuclear devices.

Maybe i will cut this video into the german version of the third truth, as a kind like an ultimate edition exclusive for your download webside. Thanks for your opinions to this video dimitri.
jorge jorge
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

WTC7 was full of secret service guys. I remind you that one of the tenants was the US Secret Service…

What makes you think he is the “nuclear demolition man” ? I don´t http://think 911Blogger.com is fake…
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

this guy is wearing a secret service uniform, in what alternate universe do you make the leap to OTS? why? there is no reason to say this
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to Denierbud11

shill right here
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

And, speaking of shills… Beware of the fake (or already under control) 9/11 Truth sites. 911Blogger.com , for example, won’t let me even post a comment concerning this video, on a post about this mysterious man seen at WTC 7.
Denierbud11
1 year ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

this is an example of truther lies, this is a secret service uniform division guy, he has nothing to do with the transportation of nuclear weapons
Beant Lamba
1 year ago

Gman at WTC 7 was only getting his fair share

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nvVY8kYPow

he survived going to jail
vividbv
1 year ago
in reply to Sylvie Bertran

Yes, but how long did the dust last in the air? Less than one week? I think it is highly unlikely you would die from that.

But you can really die from exposure to radioactive vapors, and I think that is the explanation for the amount of cancers detected, as Dimitri pointed out.
vividbv
1 year ago
in reply to Sylvie Bertran

It is not cancerous dust. It was radioactive vapors. Although maybe the asbestos dust helped a little.
wordgeezer
1 year ago

interesting…this Gman was also indited for stealing cars from ground zero but got off scott free… Gman at WTC 7 was only getting his fair share Prosecutor Gets Berated By Judge In Car Theft Case BY JOHN MARZULLI DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER Thursday, October 27, 2005
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

It seems to be a reflection on a window, or some sort of reflective surface, of the guy holding the video camera (on the left) and the “nuclear demolition guy” (on the right). (As it can also be seen, on another window, at 1:45.)
zoofilo89
1 year ago
in reply to Sven Krause

we don’t need brainless people to comment
barthoedemaker
1 year ago

things seem to fall into places now, but still we need names…the new world order plan is so big, that 9-11 was just a part of the masterplan
SHLOMO_GOLDBLATTBURGSILVERSTEINSHECKELSTERNBERG
1 year ago

what do you think about this “Britam” story?

Alex Jones Show: Sunday (1-27-13) Full Show

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=to31eZ_qMJQ&t=110m43s

WTCNUKED
1 year ago

Also at 1:57 you can notice 2 persons in the back clearly busy doing something.
roykeanz
1 year ago

Wonderful video … thanks Dimitri and WTCNUKED.

That first guy in the vid [let's call him "Stair Runner"!] is real suspicious too. Seems to be in one hell of a rush to warn “Bennette” (surely not his real name) of the journalist’s imminent arrival.

Does the logo on the seemingly official shirt that “Stair Runner” is wearing tell us anything about who he’s working for?
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

I suggest people better google for “I was a paid shill” – this will return good results

- there is an unprecedented article written by a former paid shill. Anywhow, the shills can not enjoy today the same impunity as the used to 2-3 years ago.

Their sick fun is over – people began to understand that the shills do exist and since they have this understanding it become much easier for them to distinguish shills and to deal with their bullshit.
Fernando Negro
1 year ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

I think everyone sufficiently well informed to know about your findings knows what kind of characters those are.

And I usually just ignore them, because they can never produce any serious or credible arguments.

But, for those who don’t know what a “troll” is, look up on the Internet for information about COINTELPRO and how the US government has an habit of paying people to try to disrupt discussions that are counter to the interests of the establishment (e.g. “Pentagon Armies of Paid Trolls”).
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to Sven Krause

It seems that the shills will never have rest (unless shot at the back of their heads in a-la Pol Pot manner, of course)…

Once something important is discovered, the shills will be here at once. People, please, take good care of that guy. I have no time for him, unfortunately.
WTCNUKED
1 year ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

Also I think the first person who the camera men sees running in WTC7, he runs a bit ahead, then on the stairs he quickly watches behind him and sees the camera man follows him, then when they are upstairs it kinda looks if they are both “acting” infront of the camera, first thing Bennette says is “im the last 1″ they do everything they can to show that there is NO ONE in that building
Sven Krause
1 year ago

Dimitri..in 1962 a 100kt Bomb have creating a 200 Meter Deep Hole in Nevada!3 Bombs @150KT in only 77Meter so Bülow the WTC into the Space , please stop this Nuklear Bullshit
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to WTCNUKED

You are welcome :) I have no words engough to express my thanks to you, actually. If not you, I would never ever notice this masterpiece.
WTCNUKED
1 year ago

Good to see you posted my info Dimitri!
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to vividbv

Hi. Thanks a lot for doing this.

Would you mind to contact me directly by my e-mail? We will discuss it separately.
esh1
1 year ago

OST Bennett, so where is that guy nowadays???

Hope he didn’t have one of those mysterious plane crashes or something…

This is a very powerful video but I am not entirely convinced.
RunAMuckGirl2
1 year ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

The key here is “ALSO uncovered” I mean. This is so multi-layered. Yes, I would guess they whole demolition team would have white hats.
RunAMuckGirl2
1 year ago
in reply to Dimitri Khalezov

No, I think you are right on with your assessment.

You have brought quite a brilliant and fresh view to this whole affair. The white helmet would, however, be like a well ingrained signal to those not in on the big picture to submit to what ever the white hat bearer instructed.

A very few would have to be managing a large number of educated men and women to pull this off.

You have just uncovered one of the ways they did that.
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to RunAMuckGirl2

Hi. Thanks for this observation. Interesting. However, I do not think that William Bennette was so big in the demolition team that he had to be distinguished from the rest by issuance of the white helmet.

I guess the entire team used white helmets (may be they just bought only white ones from the beginning).

The important thing is however the fact of having the helmet. Can anyone offer any alternative reason why might Bennette have a helmet if not because of being a member of the demolition team?
annebeck58
1 year ago

Yes, Dimitri. He also said, of the other tower (number-2, I believe); “the top of the building came down” (twice he said this).

Now, most people believed that the whole building collapsed, not that the top came down (through what was pulverized).

To me, this is a telling statement, yet Mr Bennette may not have known how important that differentiation was.

Very odd. Thanks for sending this to me.
vividbv
1 year ago

Thanks a lot for this Dimitry. Everything seems to fall into place. A bit off-topic: I’ve subtitled your DVD into Spanish so that more people around the world can have access to your valuable information.

The videos are this

Dimitri Khalezov, Demolición nuclear del World Trade Center, 1/2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bN-Uy4WMN-A

and this

Dimitri Khalezov, Demolición nuclear del World Trade Center, 2/2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gFAE8og-yA

If you want the subtitle files, let me know.
RunAMuckGirl2
1 year ago

“The colors of hard hats are used to show rank and position on the jobsite.

White hats are usually reserved for engineers and architechts and upper management like the folks financing the project” Interesting.
Jake Archer
1 year ago

D I can’t find your e-mail under all the spam, if you want to contact me using FB…facebook.com/JakeArcher72..cheers.
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to Organladen

Thanks. But the most incriminating here is not the VRU hood. The most incriminating is the CONSTRUCTION HELMET.

The VRU hood could be put on by any serviceman/civilian – just in any kind of emergency, radioactive contamination, for example, or bio/chemical hazard.

So, such an emergency apparently took place at the moment. It is not so with the construction helmet, though: they are worn by DEMOLITION MEN, not by servicemen from OST or Secret Service. The construction helmet is the smoking gun.
Organladen
1 year ago

Some product information about the VRU+/VRU hood: http://essexindustries.com/safety/product_view?nid=76
Dimitri Khalezov
1 year ago
in reply to Fernando Negro

Hi. Thanks, Fernando. Please, watch also the second important piece I uploaded today:

911 NBC – Albert Turi on ‘secondary devices’ planted in the buildings and also being on the planes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTYMzTH_ZPc

- this is about as important as the above one. The confirmation of the WTC nuclear demolition by one of he U.S> officials.
Fernando Negro
1 year ago

“…he should be from now on called ‘nuclear demolition man’ — to distinguish him from other important 9/11 personalities; he deserves this title, apparently.”

Thumbs up for that.

(Another important piece of the 9/11 puzzle, produced by the one and only Dimitri Khalezov. All the Best to you, Dimitri. Take Care and Good Luck.)

The Anatomy of a Great Decption

New Docu-thriller, “The Anatomy of a Great Deception” Launches Crowdfund Campaign on IndieGoGo

 The Anatomy of a Great Decption
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Media Contact:
Samantha Moreno, Media Relations
smoreno@movingflicks.com
734-217-7635 direct
New Docu-thriller, “The Anatomy of a Great Deception” Launches Crowdfund Campaign on IndieGoGo
The fast-paced film follows one man’s search for truth while he copes with the findings of his own 9/11 investigation.
 
Crowd Funding Request by Dave Hooperhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0vHjr_qysU#t=60
David Hooper, Filmmaker, “The Anatomy of a Great Deception”

Detroit, MI, June 6, 2014 – Documentary filmmaker, David Hooper deals with the findings of his own investigation into several mysteries surrounding the controversies of the 9/11 official story. His commentary about the emotions involved in dealing with the emotions involved sets the film apart.

The film has been completed but in order to finish the final edits and execute their unique distribution plan, Hooper has turned to the crowdfunding platform, IndieGoGo, to raise at least $50,000 dollars to execute the plan. “The film is being sound-engineered as we speak,” stated businessman-turned filmmaker, David Hooper, who expects to have the film finalized in mid-July.

“The Anatomy of a Great Deception,” which focuses much attention on the paradox of Building 7’s collapse on 9/11, seeks to add to the 9/11 truth movement’s voice, which seems to be gaining momentum. On June 2, 2014 the 24-member, 9/11 Consensus Panel – which includes physicists, chemists, engineers, commercial pilots, attorneys and lawyers announced three new studies confirming the controlled demolition of World Trade Center 7. The studies scientifically refute the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) claim that, for the first time in history, fire caused the sudden and complete collapse of a large, fire-protected, steel-framed building on 9/11.

MovingFlicks.com, a Detroit-based, independent-film studio and distribution house was formed to promote the film, for its September release. It will coincide with expected national media coverage of the 9/11 anniversary. The film will be released through conventional sales channels, including digital platforms. “But, it’s our proprietary distribution plan that has big potential, ” said the filmmaker, who, “hopes to capitalize on impulse buying habits by getting the film for sale in the checkout area of thousands of retailers in up to three Midwest cities to start.” Depending on the campaign’s level of success, the film will be introduced in Chicago, Detroit and/or Ann Arbor, MI, where filmmaker David Hooper has ties to each. If the three-city test is successful, the company plans to continue the release of the film in a city-by-city pattern, “Unless something happens to speed that up,” adds finance chief, Anthony Sousa.

  

TRAILER 1   Build 7 Paradoxhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpcZAPegYJg
Teaser Trailer 1 – The Anatomy of a Great Deception

As the pre-release marketing period winds down, Moving Flicks plans to host a launch party in Chicago and/or Detroit that will include cocktails, a screening of the film and some live entertainment.  It’s their hope to make the Chicago Launch Party this year’s rendezvous point for the 9/11 truth community.

They hope the film and launch party will contribute towards the momentum of organizations like, Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth, http://www.ae911truth.org/ a non-profit non-partisan organization of architects, engineers and affiliates dedicated to revealing facts about the complete destruction of all three World Trade Center high-rises on September 11, 2001.

Richard Gage's Endorsement of the film, The Anatomy of a Great Deception

Richard Gage’s Endorsement of the film, The Anatomy of a Great Deception

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tY1ZiGJGcLc

Richard Gage discusses his thoughts about the upcoming film, The Anatomy of a Great Deception and asks for help to get the film into the hands of lots of people.

Richard Gage’s endorsement of the film, “The Anatomy of a Great Deception”
“We’ve also pledged to donate to the Families of Freedom Scholarship Fund, which provides educational assistance to family members of victims of 9/11,” according to Samantha Moreno, head of media relations for Moving Flicks. A dollar from each DVD sold will go to these organizations.
The funding landscape has changed for filmmakers since crowdfunding emerged as an option where fans can back a project by contributing as little as a few dollars. Those few dollars can add up if you have a loyal following, The most notable example is the Veronica Mars Movie that had a limited run in March of this year.  Fans of the show raised over $5 million dollars on crowdfunding site, KickStarter, to get a feature film made.
“The money sought for “The Anatomy of a Great Deception” will help keep the memory of 9/11 alive by giving the truth some help which it seems to need,” finished Hooper. Donation levels start for as little as $5.00, which includes entry in drawing to walk the red carpet and attend the opening night screening. Donation levels at $25 include an autographed collector’s edition DVD. And it is not too late to be a producer and appear in the credits, either. “For as little as $250, not only will you have tickets to the release party, but your name will be on the silver screen as a Assistant Producer,” boasted Moreno. The gift packages reach $5000, which includes a cameo in the film and a home screening by the filmmaker.If you want to help the film’s message reach a wider audience, visit the Film’s Crowdfund Campaign, https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-anatomy-of-a-great-deception to learn more.
About Moving Flicks, LLC
Moving Flicks, LLC is a privately held company with offices in Detroit and Chicago.  Filmmaker, David Hooper spent three years making the film before forming the company in May 2014.  Moving Flicks will continue to produce and distribute independent films through its proprietary distribution network after the launch of its current film, “The Anatomy of a Great Deception.” http://www.theanatomyofagreatdeception.com/
© Copyright 2014 Moving Flicks, LLC. All rights reserved.

 Comments:

punxsutawneybarney
When can we see a real trailer?  The claim is made that the movie is done and the money is needed for distribution.  If the movie is done, we should be able to see a better trailer than this.  This doesn’t even make me want to watch the film, let alone donate money toward its distribution.?

Brian Edwards
I loved your Blair Witch Project.  I hope this is as successful.?

Harold Saive

Another 9/11 documentary?  We have so many 9/11 video projects that do little more than amuse audiences on youtube who already know 9/11 was an inside job.  What we need is for a Hollywood producer to release a film exposing the coverup using the resources and forensic evidence of  Richard Gage’s organization – http://AE911Truth.org  – This is not likely to happen.?

David Hooper

Harold, Richard Gage is totally behind this film.  Find out why before you poop on the idea!  You’ll be surprised to know what is going on behind the scenes with this film.?

Harold Saive

Instead of creating another DVD, let’s raise money to support the NYC High Rise Safety Initiative to expose Larry Silverstein and the Building-7 lie.  Another DVD project seems like just more self-indulgence.  http://highrisesafetynyc.org/about/

Michael Atkinson

Thank you for doing this film.  It is just too obvious that the official story is full of lies and omissions of easily-understandable truths.  There was a massive cover-up and people deserve the truth.?

 

 

AGE OF DECEIT – Fallen Angels and the New World

Order

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvAH06VjSNQ

Masterful work describing the Satanic deception at work in our society. By Face Like the Sun productions with Gonzo Shimura, Chris White and Doug Hamp.

9-11 AandE

CNN’s Initial Assault on AE911Truth

CNN’s “Yellow Journalism” Rating Hits All-Time High
Written by Craig McKee   

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/884-cnns-yellow-journalism-rating-hits-all-time-high-.html

9-11 AandE

 

Watch CNN “cover” the controversy over our brochure questioning the Official Story.

Here’s the Village Voice and their article that started the mainstream coverage.

Jake Tapper’s “The Lead” Dips to New Low

with “Coverage” of AE911Truth’s 9/11 Museum Brochure

It looked just like an infomercial but with a lot more frowning.

In an example of Orwellian newspeak, the CNN show The Lead with Jake Tapper took on Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth over its decision to distribute information pamphlets outside the National September 11 Memorial and Museum at Ground Zero in New York City. The pamphlets mimic the design of the “official” ones, but instead of the official story, they contain key scientific forensic evidence indicating that the three World Trade Center towers were brought down with explosives and incendiaries. Unlike the official version, the photo on the cover of the AE pamphlet shows the Twin Towers and Building 7.

The Tapper report is a hysterical compendium of all the empty slogans and anti-conspiracy-theory talking points that make up the mainstream media’s continuing attack on the 9/11 Truth Movement. It didn’t take more than a couple of seconds into the report to see how Tapper was going to play the story.

He tells us that “the conspiracy group” AE911Truth plans to stand outside the museum and hand out fake museum pamphlets that look exactly like the real ones. The volunteers handing them out are described as “so-called truthers,” and the whole exercise is labeled an “affront to the victims’ families.”

“Can’t these people give it a rest for one day out of respect for the families?” an exasperated Tapper queries, adding that the 9/11 memorial is “sacred.” Indeed, since 9/11 itself, the grounds have been transformed from a place of truth-seeking to a pathologically sacred shrine to “not asking questions about 9/11.”

Tapper contends that truthers are using the opening of the museum as an opportunity to spread their lies about the attacks. He reads from the AE pamphlet: “Welcome to the other 9/11 story,” but then adds, “the false one.”

Of AE, he says: “Of course they don’t prove anything except for man’s capacity to believe crazy things and man’s insensitivity to, for instance, the families of the approximately 3,000 people killed at the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and in a field in Pennsylvania by Islamic terrorists with al-Qaeda, as every credible investigation has actually proven.”

I’m not sure if he’s talking about the 9/11 Commission Report, which even commission members have called a “cover-up,” or the NIST report, which the 2,100 technical and building professionals with Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth have shown to be rooted in fantasy, not science.

Tapper had on the air as his guest Emily Bazelon, a senior editor of Slate magazine, whose job it was to help Tapper figure out just what is psychologically motivating all these “truthers.”

She says, “Usually, with a conspiracy theory, you imagine that people are trying to make sense of the senseless. But with 9/11, we have a real conspiracy called al-Qaeda. And so, one has to imagine that the anti-government motivation of the 9/11 truthers is really what’s driving this. Because if you could imagine the government made up 9/11 as a hoax, then the government is completely monstrous, and there’s no reason to believe anything any federal official says, and certainly no reason to pay your taxes.”

Wow. This “journalist” does a lot of imagining.

First, she admits that her pet theory…

Read the Full Story Here

Phil Schneider Speaks Out before being killed

Phil Schneider Speaks Out before being killed

 

Click on link below if it says video does not exist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMht0qmibbU&list=PLA2612DB203581AA8

Uploaded on Nov 27, 2009

Very important info about the WTC nukes two minutes into the video.

Philip Schneider was an ex-government structural engineer who was involved in building deep underground military bases for the United States government.

He was one of only three people to survive an incident that occurred in 1979 between Grey aliens and U.S. military forces at the Dulce underground base .

For the last two years of his life, Schneider gave lectures about government cover-ups, black budgets, and UFOs.

Schneider was never able or willing to prove his allegations (e.g. showing the entrance to Dulce Base).

His claims received little mainstream notice, but caused quite a buzz in UFO enthusiast circles.

Schneider was found dead in his apartment on January 17 1996.

Some suggest Schneider was murdered after several attempts on his life & his family for exposing the truth about the U.S government’s black budget & speaking openly about what’s really happening underground with the Alien agenda.

PHIL SCHNEIDER – The Last Words

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_y2ydvmX68

POST FALLS, IDAHO – MAY 8, 1995

9-11 Witness Meets Obama and Dies Six Days Later

911 Witness Meets Obama

9/11 – Woman With Victim Advocate Role Dies In A Plane Crash Days After Meeting Obama

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GZkCpXB3h0

Published on Jun 18, 2012

Beverly Eckert (May 29, 1951 — February 12, 2009) was an activist and advocate for the creation of the 9/11 Commission. She was one of the members of the 9/11 Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Commission. Eckert’s husband, Sean Rooney, died aged 50 in the attacks of September 11, 2001. She pushed for a commission to investigate 9/11 and to establish a memorial.
Eckert died at age 57 in a commuter aircraft accident on February 12, 2009. She was travelling from Newark Liberty International Airport to Buffalo Niagara International Airport aboard Colgan Air Flight 3407. The aircraft crashed in the Buffalo suburb of Clarence Center, New York. She had met with President Barack Obama just a few days before her death in her role as an advocate for those affected by 9/11.

The public faces with the role of the official victims story are dying or in Tania Head’s case claiming insanity. Youtube wont let me post any of the stories concerning Sandy Dahl’s , another public advocate widow figure, recent strange death, copyright blocked from all available sources. …. May 26, 2012. Wife Of 9/11 Pilot Jason Dahl Found Dead, Details Of Death Not Yet Released

Sandy Dahl, 52, died of natural causes in her sleep. Her body was discovered Friday morning. Dahl spent the first years after the 9/11 tragedy working toward safer airline requirements. She served on the board of many of the 9/11 memorial committees, including the Shanskville, Penn., memorial. What ‘natural causes’ cause you to die in your sleep at 52? Why the secrecy and lack of national media coverage?

Previous Sandy Dahl Stories:
May 3, 2011: Widow of United Flight 93 Pilot Feels Justice Served
December 1, 2006: Sept. 11 Pilot’s Tombstone Changed To Remove Wife’s Name (Interesting side story Dahl’s wife, Sandy Dahl, had their names inscribed together on a gravestone at Oak Hill Memorial Park in San Jose, Calif. She is suing the cemetery after she said the tombstone with both their names on it was replaced with one that has only Jason Dahl’s name on it. The cemetery said it did so at the request of her mother-in-law, Mildred Dahl.
On Monday, ONE (1) day before the lawsuit was filed, Mildred Dahl died at age 83.)
June 2, 2006: Flight 93 Pilot’s Wife Concerned With Airline Security
December 1, 2005: 9/11 Crash Memorial ‘Crescent Moon’ Plan Replaced After Criticism

Tania Head surfaced after 9/11 with an astonishing tale of survival and loss. Her story of barely escaping death in the south tower, and losing her husband, Dave, in the north tower, inspired everyone who heard it. She cultivated friendships with fellow survivors and became president of the influential World Trade Center Survivors’ Network. But she had a secret that, when it was finally revealed seven years later, would stun and crush the courageous people whom she claimed to champion

www.illuminatikillers.org
9/11: The Dead Witnesses

WHO KNEW TOO MUCH?

Barry Jennings (Eyewitness to explosions and bodies inside WTC7) — Undisclosed causes

Kenneth Johannemann (Eyewitness to explosions inside WTC, Saw no airplanes hit but just saw “floors blow up”) — Gunshot to the head, ruled a suicide

Beverly Eckert (Wife of 9/11 WTC Victim, Earwitness to WTC Explosion, Refused hush money) — Airplane crash

Prasanna Kalahasthi (Wife of 9/11 “Flight 11 Passenger”) — Suicide by hanging

David Graham (Dentist who saw three of the 9/11 Hijackers with Pakistani businessman in Shreveport, Louisiana) — Murdered (Poisoned with anti-freeze)

Paul Smith (Pilot of WABC7’s 9/11 “International Shot” Chopper) — Car accident

Michael H. Doran (9/11 Victims Lawyer) — Airplane crash

Bertha Champagne (Longtime babysitter for 911 Perp Marvin Bush’s family) — Crushed by a car

Christopher Landis (Former Operations Manager for Safety Service Patrol for the Virginia Department of Transportation, Interviewed by makers of “The Pentacon”, Gave makers of “The Pentacon” a photo collection, Involved in the response to the Pentagon attack) — Suicide

John P. O’Neill (FBI Counter-terrorism expert, Obsessed with catching Osama Bin Laden, Suspected Clinton/Bush/FBI complicity in the cover-up and protection of Bin Laden) — Died in the WTC on 9/11

Deborah Palfrey (Ran an escort service that had 911 Perps on it’s list) — Suicide by hanging

David Wherley (US General who ordered fighter jets to scramble on 9/11) — Train crash

Un-named Ticket Agent (Boston Logan Ticket Agent who checked Atta and Alomari) — Suicide

Suzanne Jovin (Yale Student who had a thesis about Osama Bin Laden, Her thesis adviser was an intelligence operative) — Murdered (Killer unknown)

Perry Kucinich (Brother of Congressman who advocated new 9/11 investigation) — Fell down

Salvatore Princiotta (9/11 FDNY Firefighter from Ladder 9) — Murdered

Ezra Harel (Chairman of the Israeli Company That Handled Security For All 9/11 Airports) — Heart attack

Bruce Ivins (Patsy in the 9/11-linked “Anthrax” Case) — Drug overdose

Danny Jowenko died in a car crash against a tree. He was an explosives expert who told WTC7 was definitely brought down by a controlled demolition and this is not a one day job!

For more info in dutch (with english movies):
http://www.wanttoknow.nl/nieuws/danny-jowenko-overleden/

Mysterious Deaths of 9/11 Witnesses (MUST SEE)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU

Uploaded on Feb 14, 2010

So many 9/11 witnesses or people who would seem to have knowledge of the cover up have been mysteriously dying. This all can’t be a coincidence.

Ex-CIA Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers

Monday, March 3, 2014 6:12
http://beforeitsnews.com/eu/2014/03/ex-cia-pilot-gives-sworn-testimony-that-no-planes-hit-the-twin-towers-2552498.html

(Before It’s News)

US Will Have To Rebut Or Accept Statement As Truth
By: Ron Baitley-Simens
 on 3rd March 2014 @ 9.21am
feature image number one
A former CIA and civilian pilot has sworn an affidavit, stating that no planes flew into the Twin Towers as it would have been physically impossible.
John Lear, the son of Learjet inventorBill Lear, has given his expert evidence that it would have been physically impossible for Boeing 767s, like Flights AA11 and UA175 to have hit the Twin Towers on 9/11, particularly when flown by inexperienced pilots:
‘No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors’, he stated in the affidavit.
‘Such crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted, for the following reasons: in the case of UAL 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun ‘telescoping’ when the nose hit the 14 inch steel columns which are 39 inches on center.
‘The vertical and horizontal tail would have instantaneously separated from the aircraft, hit the steel box columns and fallen to the ground.
‘The engines when impacting the steel columns would havemaintained their general shape and either fallen to the ground or been recovered in the debris of the collapsed building.
‘No Boeing 767 could attain a speed of 540 mph at 1000 feet above sea level ‘parasite drag doubles with velocity’ and ‘parasite power’ cubes with velocity.
  • The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed.
  • The piece of alleged external fuselage containing 3 or 4 window cutouts is inconsistent with an airplane that hit 14 inch steel box columns, placed at over 500 mph.  It would have crumpled.
  • No significant part of the Boeing 767 or engine could have penetrated the 14 inch steel columns and 37 feet beyond the massive core of the tower without part of it falling to the ground.
‘The debris of the collapse should have contained massive sections of the Boeing 767, including 3 engine cores weighing approximately 9000 pounds apiece which could not have been hidden. Yet there is no evidence of any of these massive structural components from either 767 at the WTC. Such complete disappearance of 767s is impossible.
The affidavit, dated 28th January 2014 is part of a law suit being pursued byMorgan Reynolds in the United States District Court, Southern District, New York.
In March 2007, Reynolds, a former chief economist under the George W Bush administration filed a Request For Correction with the US National Institute of Science and Technology citing his belief that real commercial jets (Boeings) did not hit the WTC towers.
Although the 9/11 Truth movement initially rejected the ‘no-planes’ theory as too outlandish, after scientific and rational analysis, it has become a widely accepted explanation of the evidence collected.
feature image number two
Unlike any other form of statement, an affidavit becomes truth in law, if it is not rebutted.  It will now be up to critics of the theory to present their evidence and analysis to rebut the statement point by point.  If they do not – or cannot – then the US government will be obliged to admit that the account given by the 9/11 Commission is wrong.
The 65 year old retired airline captain and former CIA pilot – who has over 19,000 hours of flight time — also drew attention to the inexperience of the pilots who allegedly flew the planes:
‘The alleged ‘controlled’ descent into New York on a relatively straight course by a novice pilot in unlikely in the extreme because of the difficulty of controlling heading, descent rate and descent speed within the parameters of ‘controlled’ flight.
‘It takes a highly skilled pilot to interpret the “EFIS” (Electronic Flight Instrument Display) display, with which none of the hijacker pilots would have been familiar or received training on, and use his controls, including the ailerons, rudder, elevators, spoilers and throttles to effect, control and maintain a descent.
Lear has, according to his sworn statement, flown over 100 different types of planes during his 40 years of flying and holds more FAA airman certificates than any other FAA certificated airman. He flew secret missions for the CIA in Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa between 1967 and 1983 then spent 17 years working for several passenger and cargo airlines as Captain, Check Airman and Instructor.
He is a member of Pilotfor911truth.org, which has consistently shown that it was impossible for jet airliners to have hit the Twin Towers in the way the 9/11 Commission has suggested.

Spread the seeds of truth

The R.A.W.W. Scoop

We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and the depth of our answers.

Around Halifax Nova Scotia

Local News and Events

World Awash In Environmental Armageddon

Dedicated to Revealing the True State of the Global Environment

The Extinction Protocol

Geologic and Earthchange News events

Laurel Sobol World Art Guild

FINE ART AND LITERATURE

Hilary Beaumont

Frequently ask questions

Phoenix Rising from the Gulf

The BP Gulf Oil Spill Revealed

Holohoax

Questions about the holocaust official narrative.

CRISISBOOM

The more you know, the better off you will be...

Martin Truther King

Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?

Galactic Connection

UFO | Ascension | Conspiracy | Spirituality

HOPEGIRL BLOG

HOME OF THE FIX THE WORLD ORGANIZATION

ripnwo

The End of NWO is NOW!

Underground Documentaries

Free documentaries online

Truther.org

"PEACE BY REVELATION" EST. 2007

The Fukushima Radiation Tree Reports

On Going Nuclear Apocalypse Threatens The Planet

A NATION OF TRAITORS TO THE CONSTITUTION

Exposing USA Perpetrators of COINTELPRO & DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONRY on Citizens from the Ground & Skies

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 769 other followers

%d bloggers like this: